HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 670 Prime) 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 (Kryo 670 Gold) 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 670 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 770 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 642L |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | |
| Execution units | 16 | 4 |
| Shaders | 256 | 384 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | 2520x1080@144Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 1x 36MP + 1x 22MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 3.7 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.6 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2021 Quarter 2 |
| Partnumber | SM7325 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Apple A15 Bionic
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
3
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs MediaTek Dimensity 1050
4
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
6
MediaTek Helio P22 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7360
7
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 1580
8
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Unisoc T9100
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
10
MediaTek Helio P95 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200