HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and Unisoc Tiger T310 are two processors with distinct specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710 features 8 cores with an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz - Cortex-A73 and 4x 1.7 GHz - Cortex-A53. On the other hand, the Tiger T310 has 4 cores with an architecture of 1x 2 GHz - Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz - Cortex-A55. This indicates that the Kirin 710 offers a higher number of cores, which may contribute to better multitasking capabilities.
Regarding the instruction set, the Kirin 710 is equipped with ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T310 features ARMv8.2-A. Although the Tiger T310 incorporates a more advanced instruction set, it is worth noting that the Kirin 710 is not far behind and continues to provide efficient performance.
Both processors have a lithography of 12 nm, indicating a relatively advanced manufacturing process. This ensures efficiency and power savings, leading to enhanced battery life for devices utilizing these processors.
When considering the number of transistors, the Kirin 710 boasts 5,500 million transistors. In contrast, information regarding the number of transistors for the Tiger T310 is not provided. However, it is expected that the Tiger T310 contains a lower number of transistors due to its smaller number of cores.
Lastly, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Kirin 710 is 5 Watts. Information regarding the TDP for the Tiger T310 is not available.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and Unisoc Tiger T310 have different specifications that cater to varying user needs. The Kirin 710 offers a higher number of cores and a considerable number of transistors, potentially resulting in superior multitasking capabilities. However, the Tiger T310 features an advanced instruction set. Both processors share a 12 nm lithography, indicating efficient power consumption. It is important to consider these specifications when choosing the appropriate processor for specific device requirements.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Kirin 710 features 8 cores with an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz - Cortex-A73 and 4x 1.7 GHz - Cortex-A53. On the other hand, the Tiger T310 has 4 cores with an architecture of 1x 2 GHz - Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz - Cortex-A55. This indicates that the Kirin 710 offers a higher number of cores, which may contribute to better multitasking capabilities.
Regarding the instruction set, the Kirin 710 is equipped with ARMv8-A, while the Tiger T310 features ARMv8.2-A. Although the Tiger T310 incorporates a more advanced instruction set, it is worth noting that the Kirin 710 is not far behind and continues to provide efficient performance.
Both processors have a lithography of 12 nm, indicating a relatively advanced manufacturing process. This ensures efficiency and power savings, leading to enhanced battery life for devices utilizing these processors.
When considering the number of transistors, the Kirin 710 boasts 5,500 million transistors. In contrast, information regarding the number of transistors for the Tiger T310 is not provided. However, it is expected that the Tiger T310 contains a lower number of transistors due to its smaller number of cores.
Lastly, the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Kirin 710 is 5 Watts. Information regarding the TDP for the Tiger T310 is not available.
Overall, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and Unisoc Tiger T310 have different specifications that cater to varying user needs. The Kirin 710 offers a higher number of cores and a considerable number of transistors, potentially resulting in superior multitasking capabilities. However, the Tiger T310 features an advanced instruction set. Both processors share a 12 nm lithography, indicating efficient power consumption. It is important to consider these specifications when choosing the appropriate processor for specific device requirements.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 2 |
| Shaders | 64 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | 10 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2019 April |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | T310 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Apple A12 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 7904
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7030
4
Apple A13 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5
MediaTek Helio G25 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 430 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
7
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs MediaTek Dimensity 7300
8
HiSilicon Kirin 9010 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
9
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Samsung Exynos 980
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Samsung Exynos 9825