HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features an architecture composed of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. It has a lithography of 12 nm, which refers to the size of the transistors on the chip. The Kirin 710 is equipped with 5500 million transistors and operates at a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G features an architecture that consists of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Kirin 710, it also has 8 cores and follows the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Tanggula T760 operates at a smaller lithography of 6 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. It also has a TDP of 5 Watts but boasts an additional feature of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
When comparing the two processors, it is evident that the Tanggula T760 has a newer and more advanced architecture with Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores compared to the Kirin 710's Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores. Additionally, the Tanggula T760's 6 nm lithography suggests improved power efficiency and potentially better performance. The inclusion of an NPU in the Tanggula T760 also indicates its ability to handle AI tasks more efficiently.
While both processors have similar TDP values, the specifications of the Tanggula T760 suggest a more powerful and efficient processor overall. However, it is important to note that the real-world performance of these processors can vary depending on other factors such as software optimization and device implementation.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features an architecture composed of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set. It has a lithography of 12 nm, which refers to the size of the transistors on the chip. The Kirin 710 is equipped with 5500 million transistors and operates at a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G features an architecture that consists of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Kirin 710, it also has 8 cores and follows the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Tanggula T760 operates at a smaller lithography of 6 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. It also has a TDP of 5 Watts but boasts an additional feature of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
When comparing the two processors, it is evident that the Tanggula T760 has a newer and more advanced architecture with Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores compared to the Kirin 710's Cortex-A73 and Cortex-A53 cores. Additionally, the Tanggula T760's 6 nm lithography suggests improved power efficiency and potentially better performance. The inclusion of an NPU in the Tanggula T760 also indicates its ability to handle AI tasks more efficiently.
While both processors have similar TDP values, the specifications of the Tanggula T760 suggest a more powerful and efficient processor overall. However, it is important to note that the real-world performance of these processors can vary depending on other factors such as software optimization and device implementation.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
TDP | 5 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 6 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | T760 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 9609
2
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Apple A15 Bionic
3
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Unisoc SC9863A
4
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
6
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
7
Unisoc Tiger T700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
10
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Apple A10X Fusion