HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors that offer impressive specifications. Let's compare these two processors by their specifications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it is equipped with 8 cores and an architecture that consists of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a transistor count of 5500 million, this processor offers good processing power while maintaining a low power usage of 5 watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 also boasts 8 cores with a slightly different architecture. It features 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a balanced combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores. The Dimensity 920 operates on the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set and offers a more advanced lithography of 6 nm. It has a higher TDP of 10 watts, indicating that it may consume more power than the Kirin 710.
One notable difference between these two processors is the inclusion of Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the MediaTek Dimensity 920. This dedicated neural processing capability enhances AI-related tasks and can be beneficial for applications such as image recognition and voice assistants.
Both processors have their strengths, with the Kirin 710 offering a lower power consumption and the Dimensity 920 boasting a more advanced lithography and a dedicated NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user, whether it be battery efficiency or AI capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it is equipped with 8 cores and an architecture that consists of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. It operates on the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. With a transistor count of 5500 million, this processor offers good processing power while maintaining a low power usage of 5 watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 also boasts 8 cores with a slightly different architecture. It features 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a balanced combination of high-performance and power-efficient cores. The Dimensity 920 operates on the newer ARMv8.2-A instruction set and offers a more advanced lithography of 6 nm. It has a higher TDP of 10 watts, indicating that it may consume more power than the Kirin 710.
One notable difference between these two processors is the inclusion of Neural Processing Unit (NPU) in the MediaTek Dimensity 920. This dedicated neural processing capability enhances AI-related tasks and can be beneficial for applications such as image recognition and voice assistants.
Both processors have their strengths, with the Kirin 710 offering a lower power consumption and the Dimensity 920 boasting a more advanced lithography and a dedicated NPU. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the user, whether it be battery efficiency or AI capabilities.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 6 nm |
| Number of transistors | 5500 million | |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 950 MHz |
| Execution units | 4 | 4 |
| Shaders | 64 | 96 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2520x1080@120Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
| Partnumber | Hi6260 | MT6877T |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
2
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 vs MediaTek Helio G90
3
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
5
Apple M2 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
6
MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
7
Apple A15 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 7020
8
MediaTek Helio G50 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
9
MediaTek Dimensity 7300 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
10
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 450