HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 3 GHz – Cortex-X2 (Kryo Prime) 3x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A710 (Kryo Gold) 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510 (Kryo Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv9-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 4 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 5.3 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 3200 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 730 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 700 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 820 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 3 |
| Shaders | 352 | 768 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160@60Hz |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 1x 64MP + 1x 36MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 8K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 10 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2021 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | SM8450 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
2
Apple A10X Fusion vs MediaTek Helio G88
3
Apple A18 vs Google Tensor G2
4
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Apple A18 Pro
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Samsung Exynos 1580
6
Unisoc Tiger T616 vs Apple A9
7
MediaTek MT6739 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
8
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs MediaTek Helio G81
9
Apple A11 Bionic vs Apple A15 Bionic
10
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200