HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and the HiSilicon Kirin 935 are two processors designed by HiSilicon, a subsidiary of Huawei Technologies. While they both belong to the Kirin series, they differ in terms of specifications and performance.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features an architecture with 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a balanced combination of power and efficiency. The processor is built on a 12 nm lithography, allowing for improved power efficiency and performance. It packs 5,500 million transistors, which indicates a high level of integration on the chip. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Kirin 710 is 5 Watts, which suggests that it consumes less power and produces less heat.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 features an architecture with 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. Like the Kirin 710, it offers 8 cores for multitasking capabilities. However, the Kirin 935 is built on a 28 nm lithography, which is less advanced compared to the Kirin 710. This translates to slightly reduced power efficiency and performance. It has 1,000 million transistors, indicating lower integration compared to the Kirin 710. The TDP of the Kirin 935 is 7 Watts, implying it consumes slightly more power and generates more heat compared to the Kirin 710.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and the HiSilicon Kirin 935 differ in terms of lithography, number of transistors, and TDP. The Kirin 710 offers a more advanced 12 nm lithography, higher transistor count, and lower power consumption compared to the Kirin 935 with its 28 nm lithography, lower transistor count, and slightly higher power consumption. These differences indicate that the Kirin 710 may provide better performance and energy efficiency compared to the Kirin 935 in real-world applications.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features an architecture with 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a balanced combination of power and efficiency. The processor is built on a 12 nm lithography, allowing for improved power efficiency and performance. It packs 5,500 million transistors, which indicates a high level of integration on the chip. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the Kirin 710 is 5 Watts, which suggests that it consumes less power and produces less heat.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 935 features an architecture with 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A53 cores and 4x 1.5 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. Like the Kirin 710, it offers 8 cores for multitasking capabilities. However, the Kirin 935 is built on a 28 nm lithography, which is less advanced compared to the Kirin 710. This translates to slightly reduced power efficiency and performance. It has 1,000 million transistors, indicating lower integration compared to the Kirin 710. The TDP of the Kirin 935 is 7 Watts, implying it consumes slightly more power and generates more heat compared to the Kirin 710.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and the HiSilicon Kirin 935 differ in terms of lithography, number of transistors, and TDP. The Kirin 710 offers a more advanced 12 nm lithography, higher transistor count, and lower power consumption compared to the Kirin 935 with its 28 nm lithography, lower transistor count, and slightly higher power consumption. These differences indicate that the Kirin 710 may provide better performance and energy efficiency compared to the Kirin 935 in real-world applications.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A53 4x 1.5 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | 1000 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 7 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 800 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.0 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-T628 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Mali Midgard |
GPU frequency | 1000 MHz | 680 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 64 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 2560x1600 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2015 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | Hi3635 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
2
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
4
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
6
Apple A14 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3
7
MediaTek Dimensity 7020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
8
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 460
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3 vs MediaTek Helio G35
10
Unisoc Tiger T612 vs Apple A18