Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and Unisoc Tiger T710 are two processors that differ in their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, this processor features a combination of CPU cores and architecture. It includes 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, bringing a total of 4 cores. The instruction set it supports is ARMv8.2-A, making it compatible with the latest software and technologies. Additionally, it has a lithography size of 12 nm, which helps optimize power consumption and heat dissipation.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 offers a different CPU core and architecture configuration. It consists of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a total of 8 cores. Similar to the T310, it also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and features a lithography size of 12 nm. However, the T710 has an additional feature called Dual NPU, which stands for Neural Processing Units. This means it has dedicated hardware for accelerating AI-related tasks, such as image recognition or voice assistance.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the T310 has a higher frequency for its main Cortex-A75 core (2 GHz) compared to the T710's Cortex-A75 cores (1.8 GHz). However, the T710 compensates for this by offering a higher number of cores (8 cores in total) compared to the T310 (4 cores).
Both processors have the same instruction set and lithography size, suggesting they have similar compatibility and power efficiency. However, the T710's addition of Dual NPU gives it an edge in AI-related tasks by providing dedicated hardware for optimized performance.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T310 and T710 share similarities in terms of instruction set and lithography, they differ in their CPU core and architecture configuration. The T310 has a higher frequency for its main core, while the T710 offers more cores and the inclusion of Dual NPU for improved AI performance.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, this processor features a combination of CPU cores and architecture. It includes 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 core and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, bringing a total of 4 cores. The instruction set it supports is ARMv8.2-A, making it compatible with the latest software and technologies. Additionally, it has a lithography size of 12 nm, which helps optimize power consumption and heat dissipation.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T710 offers a different CPU core and architecture configuration. It consists of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, providing a total of 8 cores. Similar to the T310, it also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and features a lithography size of 12 nm. However, the T710 has an additional feature called Dual NPU, which stands for Neural Processing Units. This means it has dedicated hardware for accelerating AI-related tasks, such as image recognition or voice assistance.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the T310 has a higher frequency for its main Cortex-A75 core (2 GHz) compared to the T710's Cortex-A75 cores (1.8 GHz). However, the T710 compensates for this by offering a higher number of cores (8 cores in total) compared to the T310 (4 cores).
Both processors have the same instruction set and lithography size, suggesting they have similar compatibility and power efficiency. However, the T710's addition of Dual NPU gives it an edge in AI-related tasks by providing dedicated hardware for optimized performance.
In conclusion, while the Unisoc Tiger T310 and T710 share similarities in terms of instruction set and lithography, they differ in their CPU core and architecture configuration. The T310 has a higher frequency for its main core, while the T710 offers more cores and the inclusion of Dual NPU for improved AI performance.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | PowerVR Rogue | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 660 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | |
| Shaders | 32 | |
| DirectX | 10 | |
| OpenCL API | 3.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1600x720 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP | 1x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 April | 2019 |
| Partnumber | T310 | T710 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G90 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
2
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs MediaTek Helio P90
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8400 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
4
Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
7
MediaTek MT6739 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
8
Apple A19 vs Samsung Exynos 1480
9
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
10
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7100