HiSilicon Kirin 710 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
The HiSilicon Kirin 710 and the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G are two processors with distinct specifications, each designed for different purposes and capabilities.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and is built on a 12-nanometer lithography. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a balance between power and efficiency. The Kirin 710 has a total of 5,500 million transistors and has a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G has a more advanced architecture. It is equipped with 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. These cores, based on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, support high-performance processing. With its 5-nanometer lithography, the Kirin 9000E 5G offers better power efficiency and performance. It boasts a significant increase in the number of transistors at 15,300 million compared to the Kirin 710. Additionally, it has a TDP of 6 Watts and incorporates advanced neural processing capabilities with Ascend Lite, Ascend Tiny, and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0.
In terms of performance, the Kirin 9000E 5G outperforms the Kirin 710 due to its advanced architecture, higher clock speeds, and increased number of transistors. Its 5G capabilities also make it more future-proof and suitable for the latest connectivity standards. The Kirin 9000E 5G is designed for flagship devices and demanding tasks, while the Kirin 710 is more suited for mid-range smartphones and everyday usage.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G offer different levels of performance and capabilities. While the Kirin 710 provides a sufficient balance of power and efficiency for mid-range devices, the Kirin 9000E 5G excels in terms of processing power, energy efficiency, and advanced features, making it suitable for high-end smartphones and demanding tasks.
Starting with the HiSilicon Kirin 710, it features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A73 cores and 4x 1.7 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. This processor utilizes the ARMv8-A instruction set and is built on a 12-nanometer lithography. With a total of 8 cores, it offers a balance between power and efficiency. The Kirin 710 has a total of 5,500 million transistors and has a TDP of 5 Watts.
On the other hand, the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G has a more advanced architecture. It is equipped with 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 core, 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 cores, and 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. These cores, based on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, support high-performance processing. With its 5-nanometer lithography, the Kirin 9000E 5G offers better power efficiency and performance. It boasts a significant increase in the number of transistors at 15,300 million compared to the Kirin 710. Additionally, it has a TDP of 6 Watts and incorporates advanced neural processing capabilities with Ascend Lite, Ascend Tiny, and HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0.
In terms of performance, the Kirin 9000E 5G outperforms the Kirin 710 due to its advanced architecture, higher clock speeds, and increased number of transistors. Its 5G capabilities also make it more future-proof and suitable for the latest connectivity standards. The Kirin 9000E 5G is designed for flagship devices and demanding tasks, while the Kirin 710 is more suited for mid-range smartphones and everyday usage.
In conclusion, the HiSilicon Kirin 710 and the HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G offer different levels of performance and capabilities. While the Kirin 710 provides a sufficient balance of power and efficiency for mid-range devices, the Kirin 9000E 5G excels in terms of processing power, energy efficiency, and advanced features, making it suitable for high-end smartphones and demanding tasks.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 5 nm |
Number of transistors | 5500 million | 15300 million |
TDP | 5 Watt | 6 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 6 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2750 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x32 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G51 MP4 | Mali-G78 MP22 |
GPU Architecture | Bifrost | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 760 MHz |
GPU boost frequency | 1000 MHz | |
Execution units | 4 | 22 |
Shaders | 64 | 352 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2340x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 40MP, 2x 24MP | |
Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.6 Gbps | 4.6 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 2.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 3 | 2020 October |
Partnumber | Hi6260 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Flagship |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
2
MediaTek Helio P90 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
3
Apple A12 Bionic vs Google Tensor G3
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
5
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
6
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888
7
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus
8
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900