Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and the Unisoc Tiger T606 are two processors with similar specifications, but with a few key differences.
In terms of their CPU cores and architecture, both the T618 and T606 have 8 cores and are based on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the T618 has a higher clock speed with 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, whereas the T606 has 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means that the T618 has a slight advantage in terms of overall processing power and performance.
Both processors also have a lithography of 12 nm and a TDP of 10 watts, indicating that they are both quite energy-efficient. However, the T618 has an additional feature in the form of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is designed to enhance AI and machine learning capabilities. This means that the T618 may have better performance in tasks involving AI or machine learning compared to the T606.
Overall, the T618 offers a higher clock speed and an NPU, giving it an advantage in terms of processing power and AI capabilities compared to the T606. However, it's important to note that there may be other factors to consider when choosing a processor, such as price, compatibility with other hardware, and specific use case requirements.
In terms of their CPU cores and architecture, both the T618 and T606 have 8 cores and are based on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the T618 has a higher clock speed with 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, whereas the T606 has 2x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means that the T618 has a slight advantage in terms of overall processing power and performance.
Both processors also have a lithography of 12 nm and a TDP of 10 watts, indicating that they are both quite energy-efficient. However, the T618 has an additional feature in the form of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which is designed to enhance AI and machine learning capabilities. This means that the T618 may have better performance in tasks involving AI or machine learning compared to the T606.
Overall, the T618 offers a higher clock speed and an NPU, giving it an advantage in terms of processing power and AI capabilities compared to the T606. However, it's important to note that there may be other factors to consider when choosing a processor, such as price, compatibility with other hardware, and specific use case requirements.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | 2 |
Shaders | 16 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1600x900@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 October | 2019 August |
Partnumber | T606 | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Apple A14 Bionic
2
Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
3
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
4
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs Apple A17 Pro
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs HiSilicon Kirin 935
6
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs MediaTek Helio A25
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus
9
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
10
Google Tensor G3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980