Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and Unisoc Tiger T606 are two processors from the same company with slightly different specifications. Let's analyze and compare these two processors based on their specifications.
In terms of architecture, both processors feature a 12 nm lithography and ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This means that they are designed to be energy-efficient and compatible with the latest software and applications.
Moving on to the CPU cores, both processors have 8 cores in total. However, there is a slight difference in the clock speed and architecture. The Unisoc Tiger T610 has 2 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at the same frequency. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 also has 8 cores, but with 2 Cortex-A75 cores and 6 Cortex-A55 cores, each running at a slightly lower frequency of 1.6 GHz.
While the difference in clock speed might not be significant, the Cortex-A75 cores in both processors indicate that they are capable of delivering higher performance compared to lower-tier Cortex cores. This means that the Unisoc Tiger T610 is likely to have a slight advantage in processing power and overall performance compared to the Unisoc Tiger T606.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating that they are designed to be energy-efficient and generate less heat during operation. This makes them suitable for mobile devices and other applications where power consumption is a concern.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T610 and Unisoc Tiger T606 processors share many similarities, including the same instruction set and lithography. However, the T610 processor has a slight advantage with its higher clock speed and improved Cortex-A75 cores, giving it a potential edge in processing power and overall performance.
In terms of architecture, both processors feature a 12 nm lithography and ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This means that they are designed to be energy-efficient and compatible with the latest software and applications.
Moving on to the CPU cores, both processors have 8 cores in total. However, there is a slight difference in the clock speed and architecture. The Unisoc Tiger T610 has 2 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at the same frequency. On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T606 also has 8 cores, but with 2 Cortex-A75 cores and 6 Cortex-A55 cores, each running at a slightly lower frequency of 1.6 GHz.
While the difference in clock speed might not be significant, the Cortex-A75 cores in both processors indicate that they are capable of delivering higher performance compared to lower-tier Cortex cores. This means that the Unisoc Tiger T610 is likely to have a slight advantage in processing power and overall performance compared to the Unisoc Tiger T606.
Both processors have a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating that they are designed to be energy-efficient and generate less heat during operation. This makes them suitable for mobile devices and other applications where power consumption is a concern.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T610 and Unisoc Tiger T606 processors share many similarities, including the same instruction set and lithography. However, the T610 processor has a slight advantage with its higher clock speed and improved Cortex-A75 cores, giving it a potential edge in processing power and overall performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1600 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP1 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | 2 |
Shaders | 16 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1600x900@90Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 October | 2019 June |
Partnumber | T606 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs MediaTek Helio P90
2
Google Tensor G1 vs Samsung Exynos 980
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
4
MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Unisoc SC7731E
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
8
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
9
Samsung Exynos 1380 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 710