Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The Unisoc Tiger T700 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T700, it is built on a 12 nm lithography and incorporates a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores. This processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP (thermal design power) of 10 Watts. With a total of 8 cores, the Tiger T700 offers a balanced combination of power efficiency and performance.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G is manufactured on a more advanced 6 nm lithography. It features a CPU architecture that includes 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T700, it also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has 8 cores. However, the Tanggula T760 5G stands out with the addition of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in AI processing tasks. Furthermore, this processor has a lower TDP of 5 Watts, suggesting improved power efficiency.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T700 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G processors differ in their lithography, CPU architecture, TDP, and the inclusion of an NPU. While the Tiger T700 offers a balanced combination of power and efficiency with its 12 nm lithography and combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A5 cores, the Tanggula T760 5G provides a more advanced 6 nm lithography, higher-performing Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, and the added benefit of an NPU for AI processing tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and requirements of the system or device they are being considered for.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T700, it is built on a 12 nm lithography and incorporates a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores. This processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP (thermal design power) of 10 Watts. With a total of 8 cores, the Tiger T700 offers a balanced combination of power efficiency and performance.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G is manufactured on a more advanced 6 nm lithography. It features a CPU architecture that includes 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T700, it also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has 8 cores. However, the Tanggula T760 5G stands out with the addition of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in AI processing tasks. Furthermore, this processor has a lower TDP of 5 Watts, suggesting improved power efficiency.
In summary, the Unisoc Tiger T700 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G processors differ in their lithography, CPU architecture, TDP, and the inclusion of an NPU. While the Tiger T700 offers a balanced combination of power and efficiency with its 12 nm lithography and combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A5 cores, the Tanggula T760 5G provides a more advanced 6 nm lithography, higher-performing Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores, and the added benefit of an NPU for AI processing tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and requirements of the system or device they are being considered for.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 2 |
| Shaders | 96 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 48MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 February | 2021 March |
| Partnumber | T760 | T700 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 7100 vs MediaTek Helio G90
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
3
Apple A10 Fusion vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
4
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 9825
5
MediaTek Dimensity 6300 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
6
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs MediaTek Helio G100
7
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
8
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Helio G35
9
Samsung Exynos 1580 vs Samsung Exynos 1480
10
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Unisoc Tiger T610