Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T616
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T616 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are two processors with different specifications.
The Unisoc Tiger T616 is built with a 12 nm lithography and has a total of 8 cores. Its CPU architecture consists of 2 Cortex-A75 cores with a clock speed of 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores with a clock speed of 1.8 GHz. This processor has an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A and has a TDP of 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G has a more advanced lithography of 6 nm. Like the Tiger T616, it also has 8 cores, but with a different CPU architecture. It consists of 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor also supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lower TDP of 5 Watts. Additionally, the Tanggula T760 5G comes with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which provides enhanced AI capabilities.
In terms of performance, the Tanggula T760 5G has an advantage over the Tiger T616 due to its more advanced lithography and higher clock speeds. The 6 nm lithography allows for better power efficiency and performance compared to the 12 nm lithography of the Tiger T616. The Cortex-A76 cores in the Tanggula T760 5G also offer improved performance compared to the Cortex-A75 cores in the Tiger T616.
While both processors support the same instruction set and have the same number of cores, the Tanggula T760 5G's NPU provides additional capabilities for AI tasks, making it a better choice for AI-intensive applications.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T616 in terms of lithography, clock speeds, and AI capabilities. However, the superiority of the Tanggula T760 5G comes at the cost of a higher TDP compared to the Tiger T616. Therefore, the choice between these two processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the desired application.
The Unisoc Tiger T616 is built with a 12 nm lithography and has a total of 8 cores. Its CPU architecture consists of 2 Cortex-A75 cores with a clock speed of 2.0 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores with a clock speed of 1.8 GHz. This processor has an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A and has a TDP of 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G has a more advanced lithography of 6 nm. Like the Tiger T616, it also has 8 cores, but with a different CPU architecture. It consists of 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor also supports ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lower TDP of 5 Watts. Additionally, the Tanggula T760 5G comes with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which provides enhanced AI capabilities.
In terms of performance, the Tanggula T760 5G has an advantage over the Tiger T616 due to its more advanced lithography and higher clock speeds. The 6 nm lithography allows for better power efficiency and performance compared to the 12 nm lithography of the Tiger T616. The Cortex-A76 cores in the Tanggula T760 5G also offer improved performance compared to the Cortex-A75 cores in the Tiger T616.
While both processors support the same instruction set and have the same number of cores, the Tanggula T760 5G's NPU provides additional capabilities for AI tasks, making it a better choice for AI-intensive applications.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T616 in terms of lithography, clock speeds, and AI capabilities. However, the superiority of the Tanggula T760 5G comes at the cost of a higher TDP compared to the Tiger T616. Therefore, the choice between these two processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements of the desired application.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 750 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 1 |
| Shaders | 96 | 16 |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 February | 2021 |
| Partnumber | T760 | T616 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200
2
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Google Tensor G1
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 vs MediaTek Helio G35
7
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs MediaTek Helio G70
9
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
10
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200