Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc Tiger T612 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it features a CPU architecture with 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor provides a balance between power and efficiency. The Instruction Set is ARMv8.2-A, which ensures compatibility with a variety of software. The lithography is 12 nm, indicating that the processor is manufactured using a 12 nanometer fabrication process. This processor has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watt, indicating the maximum amount of heat the processor can generate under normal operation.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts a more powerful architecture. It features 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor offers a higher clock speed, which results in improved performance. Similar to the Tiger T612, the Tanggula T760 5G also has 8 cores and an ARMv8.2-A Instruction Set. However, the lithography is much smaller at 6 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. The smaller lithography allows for better energy efficiency and potentially higher clock speeds. The TDP is only 5 Watt, indicating that this processor consumes less power.
One notable difference between these two processors is in the Tanggula T760 5G's neural processing capabilities. It includes an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which can enhance AI (Artificial Intelligence) tasks and improve overall performance in certain applications.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G have similar CPU architectures and core counts, there are notable differences in their clock speeds, lithography, and power consumption. The Tanggula T760 5G stands out with its higher clock speeds, smaller lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU for AI tasks. These specifications make it a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Tiger T612.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it features a CPU architecture with 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor provides a balance between power and efficiency. The Instruction Set is ARMv8.2-A, which ensures compatibility with a variety of software. The lithography is 12 nm, indicating that the processor is manufactured using a 12 nanometer fabrication process. This processor has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watt, indicating the maximum amount of heat the processor can generate under normal operation.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts a more powerful architecture. It features 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor offers a higher clock speed, which results in improved performance. Similar to the Tiger T612, the Tanggula T760 5G also has 8 cores and an ARMv8.2-A Instruction Set. However, the lithography is much smaller at 6 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. The smaller lithography allows for better energy efficiency and potentially higher clock speeds. The TDP is only 5 Watt, indicating that this processor consumes less power.
One notable difference between these two processors is in the Tanggula T760 5G's neural processing capabilities. It includes an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which can enhance AI (Artificial Intelligence) tasks and improve overall performance in certain applications.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G have similar CPU architectures and core counts, there are notable differences in their clock speeds, lithography, and power consumption. The Tanggula T760 5G stands out with its higher clock speeds, smaller lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU for AI tasks. These specifications make it a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Tiger T612.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 1 |
| Shaders | 96 | 16 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 50MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 February | 2022 January |
| Partnumber | T760 | T612 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 970 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Samsung Exynos 8895
3
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs MediaTek Helio G90
4
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
5
Unisoc SC7731E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
7
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
8
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
9
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9010 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660