Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T612
The Unisoc Tiger T612 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it features a CPU architecture with 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor provides a balance between power and efficiency. The Instruction Set is ARMv8.2-A, which ensures compatibility with a variety of software. The lithography is 12 nm, indicating that the processor is manufactured using a 12 nanometer fabrication process. This processor has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watt, indicating the maximum amount of heat the processor can generate under normal operation.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts a more powerful architecture. It features 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor offers a higher clock speed, which results in improved performance. Similar to the Tiger T612, the Tanggula T760 5G also has 8 cores and an ARMv8.2-A Instruction Set. However, the lithography is much smaller at 6 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. The smaller lithography allows for better energy efficiency and potentially higher clock speeds. The TDP is only 5 Watt, indicating that this processor consumes less power.
One notable difference between these two processors is in the Tanggula T760 5G's neural processing capabilities. It includes an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which can enhance AI (Artificial Intelligence) tasks and improve overall performance in certain applications.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G have similar CPU architectures and core counts, there are notable differences in their clock speeds, lithography, and power consumption. The Tanggula T760 5G stands out with its higher clock speeds, smaller lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU for AI tasks. These specifications make it a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Tiger T612.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T612, it features a CPU architecture with 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor provides a balance between power and efficiency. The Instruction Set is ARMv8.2-A, which ensures compatibility with a variety of software. The lithography is 12 nm, indicating that the processor is manufactured using a 12 nanometer fabrication process. This processor has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 10 Watt, indicating the maximum amount of heat the processor can generate under normal operation.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts a more powerful architecture. It features 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor offers a higher clock speed, which results in improved performance. Similar to the Tiger T612, the Tanggula T760 5G also has 8 cores and an ARMv8.2-A Instruction Set. However, the lithography is much smaller at 6 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process. The smaller lithography allows for better energy efficiency and potentially higher clock speeds. The TDP is only 5 Watt, indicating that this processor consumes less power.
One notable difference between these two processors is in the Tanggula T760 5G's neural processing capabilities. It includes an NPU (Neural Processing Unit), which can enhance AI (Artificial Intelligence) tasks and improve overall performance in certain applications.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T612 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G have similar CPU architectures and core counts, there are notable differences in their clock speeds, lithography, and power consumption. The Tanggula T760 5G stands out with its higher clock speeds, smaller lithography, and the inclusion of an NPU for AI tasks. These specifications make it a more powerful and efficient processor compared to the Tiger T612.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 1 |
Shaders | 96 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 February | 2022 January |
Partnumber | T760 | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G85 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
2
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs MediaTek Helio G35
4
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs Apple A16 Bionic
5
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
6
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
7
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8
MediaTek Helio G37 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs MediaTek Helio G90
10
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs MediaTek Helio P60