Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are two processors that have different specifications, catering to different needs and requirements.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor is designed with 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. With a lithography of 12 nm, it delivers reasonable power efficiency. The TDP, or thermal design power, is set at 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G is equipped with a CPU architecture comprising 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T610, it also features 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it stands out with its enhanced lithography of 6 nm, promising improved power efficiency. In addition, it offers Neural Processing capabilities through an integrated NPU. The TDP value is set at just 5 Watts, making it an excellent option for power-conscious devices.
Comparing the two processors, the Tiger T610 has a lower performance potential with its lower clock speeds and older generation Cortex-A75 cores compared to the Tanggula T760's higher clock speeds and newer generation Cortex-A76 cores. Additionally, the Tanggula T760 takes advantage of a more advanced lithography process, resulting in improved power efficiency. The inclusion of an NPU in the Tanggula T760 provides added capabilities for artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
Overall, the Tanggula T760 5G outperforms the Tiger T610 in terms of processing power, power efficiency, and added features. It is better suited for demanding tasks such as gaming, high-performance computing, and AI processing. However, the Tiger T610 can still be a viable option for less intensive applications where power efficiency and cost-effectiveness are prioritized.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it features a CPU architecture consisting of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor is designed with 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. With a lithography of 12 nm, it delivers reasonable power efficiency. The TDP, or thermal design power, is set at 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G is equipped with a CPU architecture comprising 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T610, it also features 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it stands out with its enhanced lithography of 6 nm, promising improved power efficiency. In addition, it offers Neural Processing capabilities through an integrated NPU. The TDP value is set at just 5 Watts, making it an excellent option for power-conscious devices.
Comparing the two processors, the Tiger T610 has a lower performance potential with its lower clock speeds and older generation Cortex-A75 cores compared to the Tanggula T760's higher clock speeds and newer generation Cortex-A76 cores. Additionally, the Tanggula T760 takes advantage of a more advanced lithography process, resulting in improved power efficiency. The inclusion of an NPU in the Tanggula T760 provides added capabilities for artificial intelligence and machine learning tasks.
Overall, the Tanggula T760 5G outperforms the Tiger T610 in terms of processing power, power efficiency, and added features. It is better suited for demanding tasks such as gaming, high-performance computing, and AI processing. However, the Tiger T610 can still be a viable option for less intensive applications where power efficiency and cost-effectiveness are prioritized.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 2 |
Shaders | 96 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 February | 2019 June |
Partnumber | T760 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Google Tensor G1
2
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
3
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Google Tensor G3
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 990
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 678
6
MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc SC7731E
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
8
Samsung Exynos 7904 vs Apple A10X Fusion
9
MediaTek Helio G95 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Helio G25