Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T310
VS
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are both processors developed by Unisoc. While they share some similarities in their instruction set and architecture, there are several key differences in their specifications that set them apart.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it features a 4-core configuration with an architecture of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. This processor is built on a 12 nm lithography process. It is designed to provide efficient performance while also ensuring power efficiency.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts an 8-core configuration with an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. This processor is built on a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. It not only offers higher clock frequencies but also benefits from its additional cores, resulting in improved multitasking capabilities and overall performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G stands out with a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts. This indicates a lower power usage, making it a suitable choice for devices requiring longer battery life. Additionally, the Tanggula T760 5G includes a neural processing unit (NPU), enabling accelerated AI capabilities, which can enhance tasks such as image recognition and voice processing.
While the Tiger T310 provides a more conservative approach with its 4-core configuration, the Tanggula T760 5G offers a more robust solution with its 8-core configuration, higher clock frequencies, and improved power efficiency. This makes the Tanggula T760 5G a potentially superior choice for users seeking more processing power, multitasking capabilities, and AI performance.
Ultimately, the decision between the Unisoc Tiger T310 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it features a 4-core configuration with an architecture of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. This processor is built on a 12 nm lithography process. It is designed to provide efficient performance while also ensuring power efficiency.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G boasts an 8-core configuration with an architecture of 4x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. This processor is built on a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. It not only offers higher clock frequencies but also benefits from its additional cores, resulting in improved multitasking capabilities and overall performance.
In terms of power consumption, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G stands out with a thermal design power (TDP) of 5 Watts. This indicates a lower power usage, making it a suitable choice for devices requiring longer battery life. Additionally, the Tanggula T760 5G includes a neural processing unit (NPU), enabling accelerated AI capabilities, which can enhance tasks such as image recognition and voice processing.
While the Tiger T310 provides a more conservative approach with its 4-core configuration, the Tanggula T760 5G offers a more robust solution with its 8-core configuration, higher clock frequencies, and improved power efficiency. This makes the Tanggula T760 5G a potentially superior choice for users seeking more processing power, multitasking capabilities, and AI performance.
Ultimately, the decision between the Unisoc Tiger T310 and Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G will depend on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 5 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1333 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
| GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 660 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 2 |
| Shaders | 96 | 32 |
| DirectX | 12 | 10 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 1600x720 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2021 February | 2019 April |
| Partnumber | T760 | T310 |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
2
HiSilicon Kirin 930 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Helio P95
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
6
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Unisoc SC9832E
8
Apple A10X Fusion vs Apple A10 Fusion
9
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Helio G36
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888