Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The Unisoc Tiger T700 and Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G are both processors designed by the company Unisoc, but they possess different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T700, it is built on a 12 nm lithography and consists of 8 CPU cores with a unique architecture. The processor includes 2 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz, which are powerful enough to handle demanding tasks. Additionally, it is accompanied by 6 Cortex-A5 cores running at the same speed, providing efficiency and balanced performance. The processor operates under the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watt.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G also operates on a 12 nm lithography and includes 8 CPU cores. However, its architecture differs from the Tiger T700. This processor consists of 4 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz, ensuring high-performance capabilities. Additionally, it includes 4 Cortex-A55 cores running at the same speed, providing optimized power consumption for lighter tasks. Similar to the Tiger T700, it also operates under the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. One distinctive feature of the Tanggula T740 5G is its dual neural processing unit (NPU), which enhances its artificial intelligence capabilities.
Both processors possess the same lithography, instruction set, and number of cores. However, they differ in architecture and added features. The Tiger T700 focuses on balancing performance and efficiency with its combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A5 cores. On the other hand, the Tanggula T740 5G emphasizes high-performance tasks with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, while also offering additional AI capabilities through its dual NPU.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tiger T700 and Tanggula T740 5G are two processors from Unisoc with differing specifications. The Tiger T700 prioritizes a balance between performance and efficiency, while the Tanggula T740 5G focuses on high-performance tasks and includes AI capabilities through its dual NPU. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the user.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T700, it is built on a 12 nm lithography and consists of 8 CPU cores with a unique architecture. The processor includes 2 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz, which are powerful enough to handle demanding tasks. Additionally, it is accompanied by 6 Cortex-A5 cores running at the same speed, providing efficiency and balanced performance. The processor operates under the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watt.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G also operates on a 12 nm lithography and includes 8 CPU cores. However, its architecture differs from the Tiger T700. This processor consists of 4 Cortex-A75 cores running at 1.8 GHz, ensuring high-performance capabilities. Additionally, it includes 4 Cortex-A55 cores running at the same speed, providing optimized power consumption for lighter tasks. Similar to the Tiger T700, it also operates under the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. One distinctive feature of the Tanggula T740 5G is its dual neural processing unit (NPU), which enhances its artificial intelligence capabilities.
Both processors possess the same lithography, instruction set, and number of cores. However, they differ in architecture and added features. The Tiger T700 focuses on balancing performance and efficiency with its combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A5 cores. On the other hand, the Tanggula T740 5G emphasizes high-performance tasks with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, while also offering additional AI capabilities through its dual NPU.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tiger T700 and Tanggula T740 5G are two processors from Unisoc with differing specifications. The Tiger T700 prioritizes a balance between performance and efficiency, while the Tanggula T740 5G focuses on high-performance tasks and includes AI capabilities through its dual NPU. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors will depend on the specific needs and requirements of the user.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | |
Shaders | 32 | |
DirectX | 11 | |
OpenCL API | 4.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2960x1440@60Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.75 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 1 | 2021 March |
Partnumber | T740, Tiger T7510 | T700 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
2
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
3
Apple A12 Bionic vs Unisoc Tiger T616
4
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
6
Apple A10 Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 2100
7
Unisoc SC7731E vs Apple A10X Fusion
8
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
9
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs MediaTek Helio A25
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs Samsung Exynos 850