Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc Tiger T612
When comparing the Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tiger T612 processors, several key specifications come into play.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, its CPU architecture consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores in total. The instruction set it supports is ARMv8.2-A and it is built using a 28 nm lithography process. Additionally, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 watts and is equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 showcases a different configuration. Its CPU architecture comprises of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, still totaling 8 cores. Similar to the SC9863A, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Tiger T612 stands out in terms of lithography as it is built using a more advanced 12 nm process. Consequently, its TDP is higher, reaching 10 watts.
Considering these specifications, a few notable differences arise. Firstly, the CPU architecture of the Tiger T612 seems more powerful with the inclusion of Cortex-A75 cores, known for their enhanced performance compared to the Cortex-A55 cores found in the SC9863A. This suggests that the Tiger T612 might offer better processing capabilities and potentially handle more demanding tasks with greater efficiency.
Additionally, the lithography process plays a role in power efficiency and potentially performance optimization. The fact that the Tiger T612 adopts a 12 nm process compared to the SC9863A's 28 nm process indicates that the former may have better power efficiency, leading to longer battery life and potentially reduced heat generation.
However, it is important to note that the TDP of the Tiger T612 is significantly higher compared to the SC9863A. This suggests that the Tiger T612 might consume more power and produce more heat. Depending on the device it is used in, this could potentially impact the overall user experience and device temperature.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tiger T612 processors differ in their CPU architecture, lithography, TDP, and potentially power efficiency. The Tiger T612 appears to offer a more powerful CPU architecture and potentially better power efficiency due to its advanced lithography process, but it also consumes more power and may generate more heat. Ultimately, the preferred processor would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device it will be used in.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, its CPU architecture consists of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 cores and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores in total. The instruction set it supports is ARMv8.2-A and it is built using a 28 nm lithography process. Additionally, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 watts and is equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU).
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 showcases a different configuration. Its CPU architecture comprises of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, still totaling 8 cores. Similar to the SC9863A, it supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Tiger T612 stands out in terms of lithography as it is built using a more advanced 12 nm process. Consequently, its TDP is higher, reaching 10 watts.
Considering these specifications, a few notable differences arise. Firstly, the CPU architecture of the Tiger T612 seems more powerful with the inclusion of Cortex-A75 cores, known for their enhanced performance compared to the Cortex-A55 cores found in the SC9863A. This suggests that the Tiger T612 might offer better processing capabilities and potentially handle more demanding tasks with greater efficiency.
Additionally, the lithography process plays a role in power efficiency and potentially performance optimization. The fact that the Tiger T612 adopts a 12 nm process compared to the SC9863A's 28 nm process indicates that the former may have better power efficiency, leading to longer battery life and potentially reduced heat generation.
However, it is important to note that the TDP of the Tiger T612 is significantly higher compared to the SC9863A. This suggests that the Tiger T612 might consume more power and produce more heat. Depending on the device it is used in, this could potentially impact the overall user experience and device temperature.
In summary, the Unisoc SC9863A and Unisoc Tiger T612 processors differ in their CPU architecture, lithography, TDP, and potentially power efficiency. The Tiger T612 appears to offer a more powerful CPU architecture and potentially better power efficiency due to its advanced lithography process, but it also consumes more power and may generate more heat. Ultimately, the preferred processor would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device it will be used in.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 3 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 550 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 128 | 16 |
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP | 1x 50MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 November | 2022 January |
Partnumber | SC9863A | T612 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
2
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 665
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs MediaTek Helio P70
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
6
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 vs Samsung Exynos 9610
8
HiSilicon Kirin 710A vs Samsung Exynos 7420
9
MediaTek Helio G90 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
10
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs MediaTek Helio P65