Unisoc SC9863A vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The Unisoc SC9863A and the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G are two processors with distinct features and specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it offers a total of 8 cores, consisting of 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and another 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.2 GHz. The processor operates on a 28 nm lithography, providing a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 Watts. Furthermore, it is equipped with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G also features 8 cores, but with a different architecture. It incorporates 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor operates on a more advanced 6 nm lithography, resulting in a slightly higher TDP of 5 Watts. Like its predecessor, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and includes an NPU for additional AI capabilities.
Comparing the two, the Tanggula T760 5G offers a more powerful and efficient performance. Its Cortex-A76 cores and advanced lithography allow for faster and more responsive operations. Additionally, the higher TDP of 5 Watts indicates that it can handle more demanding tasks without overheating.
In contrast, the SC9863A lags behind in terms of raw power and efficiency, with its lower clock speeds and older lithography. However, it still provides a satisfactory performance for everyday tasks and lighter workloads. Moreover, both processors have the advantage of an NPU, enabling them to perform AI-related tasks more efficiently.
Overall, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G outperforms the SC9863A in terms of speed, efficiency, and capabilities. It is a more suitable choice for users who require higher processing power, while the SC9863A is a viable option for those with basic computing needs. The choice ultimately depends on the specific requirements and usage scenarios of the user.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it offers a total of 8 cores, consisting of 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and another 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.2 GHz. The processor operates on a 28 nm lithography, providing a thermal design power (TDP) of 3 Watts. Furthermore, it is equipped with an ARMv8.2-A instruction set and includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced artificial intelligence capabilities.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G also features 8 cores, but with a different architecture. It incorporates 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor operates on a more advanced 6 nm lithography, resulting in a slightly higher TDP of 5 Watts. Like its predecessor, it utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and includes an NPU for additional AI capabilities.
Comparing the two, the Tanggula T760 5G offers a more powerful and efficient performance. Its Cortex-A76 cores and advanced lithography allow for faster and more responsive operations. Additionally, the higher TDP of 5 Watts indicates that it can handle more demanding tasks without overheating.
In contrast, the SC9863A lags behind in terms of raw power and efficiency, with its lower clock speeds and older lithography. However, it still provides a satisfactory performance for everyday tasks and lighter workloads. Moreover, both processors have the advantage of an NPU, enabling them to perform AI-related tasks more efficiently.
Overall, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G outperforms the SC9863A in terms of speed, efficiency, and capabilities. It is a more suitable choice for users who require higher processing power, while the SC9863A is a viable option for those with basic computing needs. The choice ultimately depends on the specific requirements and usage scenarios of the user.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 3 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 550 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 6 |
Shaders | 128 | 96 |
DirectX | 11 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080 | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 November | 2021 February |
Partnumber | SC9863A | T760 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G25 vs HiSilicon Kirin 970
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800U
3
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G
4
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
5
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 712
6
MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
7
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
8
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 660
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685