Unisoc SC9832E vs Unisoc Tiger T612
VS
The Unisoc SC9832E and Unisoc Tiger T612 are two processors with distinct features and specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it has a clock speed of 1.4 GHz and is built on a 28 nm lithography. The processor consists of 4 cores, based on the Cortex-A53 architecture, making it suitable for handling standard tasks efficiently. Its instruction set, ARMv8-A, ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. With a TDP of 7 Watt, it offers a good balance between power consumption and performance.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 presents a more advanced architecture and higher clock speeds. It has 2 Cortex-A75 cores operating at 1.8 GHz, which deliver improved performance, especially for demanding applications. Additionally, it includes 6 Cortex-A55 cores, also running at 1.8 GHz, further enhancing multitasking capabilities. With a more advanced 12 nm lithography, the Tiger T612 offers better power efficiency compared to the SC9832E. The instruction set, ARMv8.2-A, introduces new features for improved processing.
In terms of power consumption, the Tiger T612 has a TDP of 10 Watt, slightly higher than the SC9832E. This increase in power usage is expected due to the higher clock speeds and additional cores.
Considering these specifications, the Unisoc SC9832E is suitable for entry-level smartphones and devices that prioritize power efficiency and cost-effectiveness. It provides sufficient performance for everyday tasks, but might struggle with more demanding applications.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 is designed for mid-range smartphones and devices that require higher processing power. Its combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores ensures smooth multitasking and better performance for resource-intensive tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between the two processors depends on the desired level of performance, power consumption, and budget. Both processors offer a suitable solution for their intended markets, catering to different needs and requirements.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it has a clock speed of 1.4 GHz and is built on a 28 nm lithography. The processor consists of 4 cores, based on the Cortex-A53 architecture, making it suitable for handling standard tasks efficiently. Its instruction set, ARMv8-A, ensures compatibility with a wide range of software. With a TDP of 7 Watt, it offers a good balance between power consumption and performance.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 presents a more advanced architecture and higher clock speeds. It has 2 Cortex-A75 cores operating at 1.8 GHz, which deliver improved performance, especially for demanding applications. Additionally, it includes 6 Cortex-A55 cores, also running at 1.8 GHz, further enhancing multitasking capabilities. With a more advanced 12 nm lithography, the Tiger T612 offers better power efficiency compared to the SC9832E. The instruction set, ARMv8.2-A, introduces new features for improved processing.
In terms of power consumption, the Tiger T612 has a TDP of 10 Watt, slightly higher than the SC9832E. This increase in power usage is expected due to the higher clock speeds and additional cores.
Considering these specifications, the Unisoc SC9832E is suitable for entry-level smartphones and devices that prioritize power efficiency and cost-effectiveness. It provides sufficient performance for everyday tasks, but might struggle with more demanding applications.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T612 is designed for mid-range smartphones and devices that require higher processing power. Its combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores ensures smooth multitasking and better performance for resource-intensive tasks.
Ultimately, the choice between the two processors depends on the desired level of performance, power consumption, and budget. Both processors offer a suitable solution for their intended markets, catering to different needs and requirements.
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 | 2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 2 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 667 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
| GPU Architecture | Midgard | Valhall |
| GPU frequency | 680 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | 1 |
| Shaders | 4 | 16 |
| DirectX | 11 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 13MP | 1x 50MP |
| Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.05 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 | 2022 January |
| Partnumber | T612 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
4
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
5
Samsung Exynos 9610 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
6
MediaTek Helio P95 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
8
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8100
9
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs MediaTek Helio P60
10
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Samsung Exynos 1280