Unisoc SC7731E vs Unisoc Tiger T710
When comparing the Unisoc SC7731E and Unisoc Tiger T710 processors, it is evident that the Tiger T710 offers significant advancements in terms of specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the SC7731E features 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores, while the Tiger T710 boasts 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means that the Tiger T710 has a total of 8 cores, providing higher processing power and efficiency.
Regarding the instruction set, the SC7731E utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set, whereas the Tiger T710 implements the more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This allows the T710 to support more recent software and applications that may require the latest instruction set.
In terms of lithography, the SC7731E is built on a 28 nm process, whereas the Tiger T710 utilizes a more advanced 12 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Tiger T710 results in improved power efficiency and better heat management.
One notable enhancement in the Tiger T710 is the inclusion of Dual NPU (Neural Processing Units), which the SC7731E lacks. The Dual NPU in the T710 enables efficient and accelerated neural network processing, making it suitable for applications such as artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Overall, the Unisoc Tiger T710 processor clearly outperforms the SC7731E in terms of CPU cores, architecture, instruction set, lithography, and the addition of Dual NPU. These improvements translate into better performance, faster processing speeds, and enhanced capabilities for the T710. However, it's important to consider that individual requirements and budgetary considerations may play a crucial role in selecting the most suitable processor for specific applications and devices.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the SC7731E features 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores, while the Tiger T710 boasts 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means that the Tiger T710 has a total of 8 cores, providing higher processing power and efficiency.
Regarding the instruction set, the SC7731E utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set, whereas the Tiger T710 implements the more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This allows the T710 to support more recent software and applications that may require the latest instruction set.
In terms of lithography, the SC7731E is built on a 28 nm process, whereas the Tiger T710 utilizes a more advanced 12 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Tiger T710 results in improved power efficiency and better heat management.
One notable enhancement in the Tiger T710 is the inclusion of Dual NPU (Neural Processing Units), which the SC7731E lacks. The Dual NPU in the T710 enables efficient and accelerated neural network processing, making it suitable for applications such as artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Overall, the Unisoc Tiger T710 processor clearly outperforms the SC7731E in terms of CPU cores, architecture, instruction set, lithography, and the addition of Dual NPU. These improvements translate into better performance, faster processing speeds, and enhanced capabilities for the T710. However, it's important to consider that individual requirements and budgetary considerations may play a crucial role in selecting the most suitable processor for specific applications and devices.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 | 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv7-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 7 Watt | |
| Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 1 GB | up to 8 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 533 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Storage
| Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Midgard | PowerVR Rogue |
| GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Execution units | 1 | |
| Shaders | 4 | |
| DirectX | 11 | |
| OpenCL API | 1.2 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 8MP | 1x 24MP |
| Max Video Capture | HD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 2 | 2019 |
| Partnumber | T710 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Google Tensor G4 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
2
HiSilicon Kirin 9000S vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
3
MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs MediaTek MT6737
4
MediaTek Dimensity 7060 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
5
Apple M2 (iPad) vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
6
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
8
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Helio P60
10
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800