Unisoc SC7731E vs Unisoc Tiger T710
When comparing the Unisoc SC7731E and Unisoc Tiger T710 processors, it is evident that the Tiger T710 offers significant advancements in terms of specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the SC7731E features 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores, while the Tiger T710 boasts 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means that the Tiger T710 has a total of 8 cores, providing higher processing power and efficiency.
Regarding the instruction set, the SC7731E utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set, whereas the Tiger T710 implements the more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This allows the T710 to support more recent software and applications that may require the latest instruction set.
In terms of lithography, the SC7731E is built on a 28 nm process, whereas the Tiger T710 utilizes a more advanced 12 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Tiger T710 results in improved power efficiency and better heat management.
One notable enhancement in the Tiger T710 is the inclusion of Dual NPU (Neural Processing Units), which the SC7731E lacks. The Dual NPU in the T710 enables efficient and accelerated neural network processing, making it suitable for applications such as artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Overall, the Unisoc Tiger T710 processor clearly outperforms the SC7731E in terms of CPU cores, architecture, instruction set, lithography, and the addition of Dual NPU. These improvements translate into better performance, faster processing speeds, and enhanced capabilities for the T710. However, it's important to consider that individual requirements and budgetary considerations may play a crucial role in selecting the most suitable processor for specific applications and devices.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the SC7731E features 4x 1.3 GHz Cortex-A7 cores, while the Tiger T710 boasts 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This means that the Tiger T710 has a total of 8 cores, providing higher processing power and efficiency.
Regarding the instruction set, the SC7731E utilizes the ARMv7-A instruction set, whereas the Tiger T710 implements the more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This allows the T710 to support more recent software and applications that may require the latest instruction set.
In terms of lithography, the SC7731E is built on a 28 nm process, whereas the Tiger T710 utilizes a more advanced 12 nm process. The smaller lithography of the Tiger T710 results in improved power efficiency and better heat management.
One notable enhancement in the Tiger T710 is the inclusion of Dual NPU (Neural Processing Units), which the SC7731E lacks. The Dual NPU in the T710 enables efficient and accelerated neural network processing, making it suitable for applications such as artificial intelligence and machine learning.
Overall, the Unisoc Tiger T710 processor clearly outperforms the SC7731E in terms of CPU cores, architecture, instruction set, lithography, and the addition of Dual NPU. These improvements translate into better performance, faster processing speeds, and enhanced capabilities for the T710. However, it's important to consider that individual requirements and budgetary considerations may play a crucial role in selecting the most suitable processor for specific applications and devices.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.3 GHz – Cortex-A7 | 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv7-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 28 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 7 Watt | |
Neural Processing | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 1 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR3 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 533 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-T820 MP1 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Midgard | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | |
Shaders | 4 | |
DirectX | 11 | |
OpenCL API | 1.2 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.0 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1440x720 | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 8MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | HD@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | |
Wi-Fi | 4 (802.11n) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2018 Quarter 2 | 2019 |
Partnumber | T710 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs Apple A14 Bionic
4
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Helio G35
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1 vs Samsung Exynos 1380
6
MediaTek Helio G88 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 662
7
MediaTek Helio P70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
8
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
9
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Samsung Exynos 7880
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G