Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G are two processors that offer different specifications and features. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it is equipped with a 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 architecture and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture. This processor comprises a total of 8 cores and follows the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. With a lithography of 12 nm, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G features a more powerful architecture. It includes 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T610, it also has 8 cores and follows the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, this processor has a reduced lithography of 6 nm, which allows for better power efficiency. It has a lower TDP of 5 Watts.
Additionally, the Tanggula T770 5G comes with an added feature of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This NPU enhances the processor's performance by accelerating AI-related tasks and providing better machine learning capabilities. This makes the Tanggula T770 5G a more versatile and advanced choice for tasks that involve AI processing.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 offers a decent performance with its 8 cores and Cortex-A75/A55 architecture, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G takes it a step further with a more powerful Cortex-A76/A55 architecture, a smaller lithography for better power efficiency, and the added advantage of an NPU for improved AI processing capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and intended use-cases, with the Tanggula T770 5G being the more high-end and feature-rich option.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it is equipped with a 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 architecture and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 architecture. This processor comprises a total of 8 cores and follows the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. With a lithography of 12 nm, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G features a more powerful architecture. It includes 1x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A76, 3x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76, and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T610, it also has 8 cores and follows the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, this processor has a reduced lithography of 6 nm, which allows for better power efficiency. It has a lower TDP of 5 Watts.
Additionally, the Tanggula T770 5G comes with an added feature of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This NPU enhances the processor's performance by accelerating AI-related tasks and providing better machine learning capabilities. This makes the Tanggula T770 5G a more versatile and advanced choice for tasks that involve AI processing.
In summary, while the Unisoc Tiger T610 offers a decent performance with its 8 cores and Cortex-A75/A55 architecture, the Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G takes it a step further with a more powerful Cortex-A76/A55 architecture, a smaller lithography for better power efficiency, and the added advantage of an NPU for improved AI processing capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and intended use-cases, with the Tanggula T770 5G being the more high-end and feature-rich option.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 5 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 32 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | 2 |
Shaders | 96 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2160x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 24MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.7 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.5 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 February | 2019 June |
Partnumber | T770, Tiger T7520 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Samsung Exynos 850
2
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G
3
Unisoc SC9863A vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
5
Apple A15 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G88
6
Unisoc Tiger T606 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
7
MediaTek Dimensity 800 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
8
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
9
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs MediaTek Helio G25