Samsung Exynos 9825 vs Unisoc Tiger T615

VS
Which processor is better? We compared Samsung Exynos 9825 with Unisoc Tiger T615. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

AnTuTu 10

Total Score
Exynos 9825
660058
Tiger T615

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score
Exynos 9825
663
Tiger T615
443

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score
Exynos 9825
2339
Tiger T615
1460

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture 2x 2.73 GHz – Exynos M4
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A75
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55
6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55
Number of cores 8 6
Instruction Set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Number of transistors 8500 million
Neural Processing NPU -

Memory (RAM)

Max amount up to 12 GB up to 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
Memory-bus 4x16 bit 2x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification UFS 3.0

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G76 MP12 Mali-G57 MP1
GPU Architecture Mali Bifrost Mali Valhall
GPU frequency 750 MHz 850 MHz
Execution units 12 1
Shaders 192 32
OpenCL API 2.1 2.0
OpenGL API ES 3.2
Vulkan API 1.3 1.3

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution 3840x2400 2408x1080
Max camera resolution 1x 32MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP
Max Video Capture 8K@30fps FullHD+@60fps
Video codec support H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP9
H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)

Wireless

4G network Yes Yes
5G network Yes Yes
Peak Download Speed 2 Gbps 0.3 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed 0.316 Gbps 0.15 Gbps
Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) 5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
Satellite navigation BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS

Supplemental Information

Launch Date 2019 Quarter 3 2024 Quarter 3
Partnumber S5E9825
Vertical Segment Mobiles Mobiles
Positioning Flagship Low-end