HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 855. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 3.13 GHz – Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz – Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.84 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Prime) 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 485 Gold) 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 485 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Number of transistors | 15300 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 6 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 690 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G78 MP22 | Adreno 640 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 590 MHz |
| Execution units | 22 | 4 |
| Shaders | 352 | 384 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3840x2160 | 3840x2160 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 4.6 Gbps | 2 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 2.5 Gbps | 0.316 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 October | 2018 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | SM8150 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Flagship |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio P70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1
2
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs MediaTek Helio A25
3
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Google Tensor G4
4
Apple A11 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G90T
5
Unisoc Tiger T618 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs Google Tensor G2
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Samsung Exynos 980
8
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs HiSilicon Kirin 955
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7350
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 vs Unisoc Tiger T700