Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Samsung Exynos 2600

VS

Which processor is better? We compared Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 with Samsung Exynos 2600. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

AnTuTu 10

Total Score

Snapdragon 685

276375

Exynos 2600

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score

Snapdragon 685

373

Exynos 2600

3455

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score

Snapdragon 685

1597

Exynos 2600

11621

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture	4x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A73 (Kryo 265 Gold) 4x 1.9 GHz – Cortex-A53 (Kryo 265 Silver)	1x 3.8 GHz – C1-Ultra 3x 3.25 GHz – C1-Pro 6x 2.75 GHz – C1-Pro
Number of cores	8	10
Instruction Set	ARMv8-A	ARMv9.3-A
Lithography	6 nm	2 nm
Neural Processing	NPU	AI engine with 32K MAC NPU

Memory (RAM)

Max amount	up to 8 GB	up to 24 GB
Memory type	LPDDR4X	LPDDR5X
Memory frequency	2133 MHz
Memory-bus	2x16 bit	4x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification

UFS 2.2

Graphics

GPU name	Adreno 610	Xclipse 960
GPU Architecture	Qualcomm Adreno 600	RDNA
GPU frequency	950 MHz	985 MHz
Execution units	2
Shaders	128
DirectX	12	12.1
OpenCL API		2.0
OpenGL API	ES 3.2
Vulkan API	1.1	1.4

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution	2520x1080	3840x2160
Max camera resolution	1x 108MP, 2x 16MP	1x 320MP
Max Video Capture	FullHD@60fps	8K@30fps
Video codec support	H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9	AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9

Wireless

4G network	Yes	Yes
5G network	Yes	Yes
Peak Download Speed	0.39 Gbps	14.79 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed	0.15 Gbps
Wi-Fi	5 (802.11ac)	7 (802.11be)
Bluetooth	5.2	6.0
Satellite navigation	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS	BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS