Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Samsung Exynos 9609
Which processor is better? We compared Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 with Samsung Exynos 9609. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A73 (Kryo 240 Gold) 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53 (Kryo 240 Silver) |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 11 nm | 10 nm |
Number of transistors | 3000 million | |
TDP | 3 Watt | 9 Watt |
Neural Processing | Qualcomm Hexagon 683 | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 8 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x32 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Adreno 610 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
GPU Architecture | Adreno 600 | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 600 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 3 |
Shaders | 128 | 48 |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080 | 2560x1600 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@60fps | 4K@120fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.39 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.15 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 1 | 2019 Quarter 2 |
Partnumber | SM4250-AA | S5E9609 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Google Tensor G3 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
2
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
3
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T310
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1080 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G
6
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Samsung Exynos 7880
7
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs MediaTek Helio G80
9
Samsung Exynos 990 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
10
Samsung Exynos 980 vs MediaTek Helio A25