HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G with Qualcomm Snapdragon 765. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.86 GHz – Cortex-A76 2x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Prime) 1x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Gold) 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 475 Silver) |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Number of transistors | 8000 million | |
| TDP | 7 Watt | 5 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend Lite + Ascend Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture, HiAI 2.0 | Qualcomm Hexagon 696 |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 12 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 2133 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | UFS 3.0 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G76 MP16 | Adreno 620 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Bifrost | Qualcomm Adreno 600 |
| GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Execution units | 16 | 3 |
| Shaders | 256 | 192 |
| DirectX | 12 | 12 |
| OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | |
| Vulkan API | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 3360x1440@60Hz | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP | |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@60fps | 4K@30fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VC-1 VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 3.7 Gbps | |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.6 Gbps | |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS SBAS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2019 Quarter 4 | 2019 Quarter 4 |
| Partnumber | SM7250-AA | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Flagship | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc SC9832E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
2
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus vs Apple A15 Bionic
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
4
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 430
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Google Tensor G4
8
Apple A10X Fusion vs Samsung Exynos 8895
9
Xiaomi Xring O1 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9010
10
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680