MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The Unisoc Tiger T700 and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors with distinct specifications. Let's compare them based on their CPU cores and architecture.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T700, it features an architecture comprising of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores. This processor consists of a total of 8 cores, providing a balance between power and efficiency. It operates using the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. The Tiger T700 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating its energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 boasts an architecture that includes 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Tiger T700, it also has a total of 8 cores. The Dimensity 930 operates using the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it showcases a smaller lithography of 6 nm, indicating greater advancements in chip manufacturing technology. In terms of power consumption, it shares the same TDP of 10 Watts as the Tiger T700. Additionally, the Dimensity 930 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in handling artificial intelligence tasks.
Comparing these processors, we can see that both offer similar core counts and TDP values, indicating comparable power efficiency. However, there are notable differences in their clock speeds and lithography. The Dimensity 930 surpasses the Tiger T700 in clock speed, with its Cortex-A78 cores running at a faster 2.2 GHz. Furthermore, the Dimensity 930's 6 nm lithography highlights its advanced chip manufacturing process, potentially leading to improved performance and power efficiency.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 outshines the Unisoc Tiger T700 in terms of clock speed and lithography. Its Cortex-A78 cores and 6 nm lithography signify advancements in performance and power efficiency. The inclusion of an NPU further enhances its AI capabilities. However, for users seeking a well-balanced processor, the Tiger T700 with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A5 cores, along with its 12 nm lithography, remains a competitive choice.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T700, it features an architecture comprising of 2x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A5 cores. This processor consists of a total of 8 cores, providing a balance between power and efficiency. It operates using the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 12 nm. The Tiger T700 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, indicating its energy efficiency.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 boasts an architecture that includes 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Like the Tiger T700, it also has a total of 8 cores. The Dimensity 930 operates using the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it showcases a smaller lithography of 6 nm, indicating greater advancements in chip manufacturing technology. In terms of power consumption, it shares the same TDP of 10 Watts as the Tiger T700. Additionally, the Dimensity 930 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances its capabilities in handling artificial intelligence tasks.
Comparing these processors, we can see that both offer similar core counts and TDP values, indicating comparable power efficiency. However, there are notable differences in their clock speeds and lithography. The Dimensity 930 surpasses the Tiger T700 in clock speed, with its Cortex-A78 cores running at a faster 2.2 GHz. Furthermore, the Dimensity 930's 6 nm lithography highlights its advanced chip manufacturing process, potentially leading to improved performance and power efficiency.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 outshines the Unisoc Tiger T700 in terms of clock speed and lithography. Its Cortex-A78 cores and 6 nm lithography signify advancements in performance and power efficiency. The inclusion of an NPU further enhances its AI capabilities. However, for users seeking a well-balanced processor, the Tiger T700 with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A5 cores, along with its 12 nm lithography, remains a competitive choice.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
| GPU Architecture | PowerVR Rogue | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | |
| Shaders | 32 | |
| DirectX | 12 | 11 |
| OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 48MP |
| Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
| Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2021 March |
| Partnumber | T700 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
2
Unisoc SC9832E vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
3
HiSilicon Kirin 8020 vs Unisoc SC7731E
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 4 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7360
6
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
7
MediaTek Helio G90 vs MediaTek Helio P90
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6s Gen 3 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
10
MediaTek Helio G100 vs Google Tensor G1