Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Unisoc Tiger T620

VS
Which processor is better? We compared Samsung Exynos 9609 with Unisoc Tiger T620. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

AnTuTu 10

Total Score
Exynos 9609
253579
Tiger T620

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score
Exynos 9609
353
Tiger T620
499

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score
Exynos 9609
1154
Tiger T620
1547

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture 4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A73
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A53
6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
Number of cores 8 6
Instruction Set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
Lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Number of transistors 3000 million
TDP 9 Watt
Neural Processing NPU -

Memory (RAM)

Max amount up to 4 GB up to 8 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 1600 MHz 1866 MHz
Memory-bus 2x32 bit 2x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification UFS 2.1

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G72 MP3 Mali-G57 MP1
GPU Architecture Mali Bifrost Mali Valhall
GPU frequency 850 MHz 850 MHz
Execution units 3 1
Shaders 48 32
OpenCL API 2.0 2.0
OpenGL API ES 3.2
Vulkan API 1.0 1.3

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution 2560x1600 2408x1080
Max camera resolution 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP
Max Video Capture 4K@120fps FullHD+@60fps
Video codec support H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP9
H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP9

Wireless

4G network Yes Yes
5G network Yes Yes
Peak Download Speed 0.6 Gbps 0.3 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed 0.15 Gbps 0.15 Gbps
Wi-Fi 5 (802.11ac) 5 (802.11ac)
Bluetooth 5.0 5.2
Satellite navigation BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS

Supplemental Information

Launch Date 2019 Quarter 2 2024 Quarter 3
Partnumber S5E9609
Vertical Segment Mobiles Mobiles
Positioning Mid-end Low-end