MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G processor and the MediaTek Dimensity 930 processor have several similarities in terms of specifications. Both processors have 8 cores and use the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. They also share the same lithography at 6 nm and feature a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities.
However, there are notable differences between the two processors as well. In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Tanggula T760 5G has 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This arrangement offers a balance between performance and power efficiency.
On the other hand, the Dimensity 930 features 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This puts a more significant emphasis on higher performance with the A78 cores, although it might come at the expense of power efficiency.
Another distinction lies in the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the two processors. The Tanggula T760 5G has a TDP of 5 Watts, which indicates lower power consumption compared to the 10 Watt TDP of the Dimensity 930. This suggests that the Tanggula T760 5G might provide better power efficiency and potentially longer battery life in devices that incorporate it.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 930 processors offer different trade-offs in terms of CPU architecture, performance, and power efficiency. The Tanggula T760 5G prioritizes a balanced approach, while the Dimensity 930 focuses on maximizing performance. The Tanggula T760 5G also has a lower TDP, indicating better power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the device in which they will be employed.
However, there are notable differences between the two processors as well. In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Tanggula T760 5G has 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This arrangement offers a balance between performance and power efficiency.
On the other hand, the Dimensity 930 features 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This puts a more significant emphasis on higher performance with the A78 cores, although it might come at the expense of power efficiency.
Another distinction lies in the TDP (Thermal Design Power) of the two processors. The Tanggula T760 5G has a TDP of 5 Watts, which indicates lower power consumption compared to the 10 Watt TDP of the Dimensity 930. This suggests that the Tanggula T760 5G might provide better power efficiency and potentially longer battery life in devices that incorporate it.
In conclusion, the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 930 processors offer different trade-offs in terms of CPU architecture, performance, and power efficiency. The Tanggula T760 5G prioritizes a balanced approach, while the Dimensity 930 focuses on maximizing performance. The Tanggula T760 5G also has a lower TDP, indicating better power efficiency. Ultimately, the choice between the two processors depends on the specific requirements and priorities of the device in which they will be employed.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 6 | |
Shaders | 96 | |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | T760 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 vs Apple A11 Bionic
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Samsung Exynos 850
3
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 710
4
MediaTek Helio P35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
5
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
6
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
8
MediaTek Helio P65 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
10
Samsung Exynos 8890 vs Samsung Exynos 9820