MediaTek Dimensity 930 vs Unisoc SC9832E
The Unisoc SC9832E and MediaTek Dimensity 930 are two processors with notable differences in their specifications.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC9832E features a quad-core setup with 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 comes with an octa-core setup consisting of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This implies that the Dimensity 930 has more processing power and potentially better performance in multitasking scenarios.
Regarding the instruction set, both processors utilize ARMv8-A, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software and applications.
Another significant difference lies in the lithography, with the Unisoc SC9832E employing a 28 nm process, while the Dimensity 930 adopts a more advanced 6 nm process. The smaller lithography size of the Dimensity 930 allows for better power efficiency and improved thermal management, which can result in longer battery life and higher overall performance.
Furthermore, the Dimensity 930 stands out with its inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized hardware accelerates AI-related tasks, such as machine learning and image recognition, enhancing the device's overall AI capabilities.
When it comes to power consumption, the Unisoc SC9832E boasts a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 7 Watts compared to the Dimensity 930's TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP indicates reduced power usage and potentially better heat management, contributing to a more energy-efficient device.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 offers superior CPU performance with its octa-core setup and Cortex-A78 cores, while also benefiting from a smaller lithography, NPU for AI tasks, and a slightly higher TDP. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9832E utilises a quad-core configuration with Cortex-A53 cores, has a larger lithography, and consumes less power. The choice between these processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the device or application at hand.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC9832E features a quad-core setup with 4x 1.4 GHz Cortex-A53 cores. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 comes with an octa-core setup consisting of 2x 2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This implies that the Dimensity 930 has more processing power and potentially better performance in multitasking scenarios.
Regarding the instruction set, both processors utilize ARMv8-A, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software and applications.
Another significant difference lies in the lithography, with the Unisoc SC9832E employing a 28 nm process, while the Dimensity 930 adopts a more advanced 6 nm process. The smaller lithography size of the Dimensity 930 allows for better power efficiency and improved thermal management, which can result in longer battery life and higher overall performance.
Furthermore, the Dimensity 930 stands out with its inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This specialized hardware accelerates AI-related tasks, such as machine learning and image recognition, enhancing the device's overall AI capabilities.
When it comes to power consumption, the Unisoc SC9832E boasts a lower TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 7 Watts compared to the Dimensity 930's TDP of 10 Watts. A lower TDP indicates reduced power usage and potentially better heat management, contributing to a more energy-efficient device.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 930 offers superior CPU performance with its octa-core setup and Cortex-A78 cores, while also benefiting from a smaller lithography, NPU for AI tasks, and a slightly higher TDP. On the other hand, the Unisoc SC9832E utilises a quad-core configuration with Cortex-A53 cores, has a larger lithography, and consumes less power. The choice between these processors ultimately depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the device or application at hand.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 2 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 667 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR BXM-8-256 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 800 MHz | 680 MHz |
Execution units | 1 | |
Shaders | 4 | |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 1x 64MP | 1x 13MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2022 Quarter 3 | 2018 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
2
Samsung Exynos 1280 vs MediaTek Helio P35
3
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
5
Apple A11 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 710F
6
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9609
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Samsung Exynos 8895
8
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Apple A15 Bionic