MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc Tiger T710
The Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features an architecture comprised of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is designed to provide efficient multitasking capabilities. It utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and operates on a 12 nm lithography process. Additionally, the Unisoc Tiger T710 boasts Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit) technology, which enhances its performance in artificial intelligence (AI) tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 processor takes a different approach. Its architecture is equipped with 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similarly, it also consists of 8 cores, ensuring efficient performance and multitasking capabilities. The Dimensity 920 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set like the Tiger T710 but showcases a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. Additionally, the Dimensity 920 processor has a relatively low thermal design power of 10 watts (TDP). Similar to the Tiger T710, it also features an NPU (Neural Processing Unit) to enhance its AI capabilities.
In summary, both the Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors have their own set of specifications. The Tiger T710 offers a wider range of power with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, while the Dimensity 920 focuses on higher clock speeds with its Cortex-A78 cores. The Dimensity 920 also benefits from a more advanced 6 nm lithography process, leading to potential energy efficiency improvements. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the intended application.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T710, it features an architecture comprised of 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 4x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. With a total of 8 cores, this processor is designed to provide efficient multitasking capabilities. It utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and operates on a 12 nm lithography process. Additionally, the Unisoc Tiger T710 boasts Dual NPU (Neural Processing Unit) technology, which enhances its performance in artificial intelligence (AI) tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 processor takes a different approach. Its architecture is equipped with 2x 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similarly, it also consists of 8 cores, ensuring efficient performance and multitasking capabilities. The Dimensity 920 utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set like the Tiger T710 but showcases a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. Additionally, the Dimensity 920 processor has a relatively low thermal design power of 10 watts (TDP). Similar to the Tiger T710, it also features an NPU (Neural Processing Unit) to enhance its AI capabilities.
In summary, both the Unisoc Tiger T710 and MediaTek Dimensity 920 processors have their own set of specifications. The Tiger T710 offers a wider range of power with its Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, while the Dimensity 920 focuses on higher clock speeds with its Cortex-A78 cores. The Dimensity 920 also benefits from a more advanced 6 nm lithography process, leading to potential energy efficiency improvements. Ultimately, the choice between these processors will depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the intended application.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | Dual NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GM9446 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 800 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | |
Shaders | 96 | |
DirectX | 12 | |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2019 |
Partnumber | MT6877T | T710 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 955 vs Apple A10 Fusion
2
Unisoc SC7731E vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
4
HiSilicon Kirin 950 vs MediaTek Helio P65
5
Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 7880
6
MediaTek Helio G35 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
8
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
9
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Samsung Exynos 1330
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835