MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
The Unisoc Tiger T606 and the MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two powerful processors used in mobile devices. While both processors have similar specifications in terms of their number of cores, instruction set, and TDP, they differ in their architecture, lithography, and neural processing capabilities.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it features a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, with two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.6 GHz. This processor has a total of eight cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. With a 12 nm lithography, it offers decent efficiency and performance, with a TDP of 10 watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced architecture. It comprises two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Like the Tiger T606, it features eight cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 920 stands out with its 6 nm lithography, which provides improved power efficiency and performance compared to the Tiger T606. Additionally, the Dimensity 920 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enabling it to tackle AI and machine learning tasks with greater efficiency.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T606 and the MediaTek Dimensity 920 have similar core counts, instruction sets, and TDP, the Dimensity 920 offers better performance and power efficiency due to its more advanced architecture and 6 nm lithography. Furthermore, the inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 920 makes it more suitable for handling AI and machine learning tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device and its users.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T606, it features a combination of Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A55 cores, with two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.6 GHz. This processor has a total of eight cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. With a 12 nm lithography, it offers decent efficiency and performance, with a TDP of 10 watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 920 boasts a more advanced architecture. It comprises two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Like the Tiger T606, it features eight cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 920 stands out with its 6 nm lithography, which provides improved power efficiency and performance compared to the Tiger T606. Additionally, the Dimensity 920 includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), enabling it to tackle AI and machine learning tasks with greater efficiency.
In summary, while both the Unisoc Tiger T606 and the MediaTek Dimensity 920 have similar core counts, instruction sets, and TDP, the Dimensity 920 offers better performance and power efficiency due to its more advanced architecture and 6 nm lithography. Furthermore, the inclusion of an NPU in the Dimensity 920 makes it more suitable for handling AI and machine learning tasks. Ultimately, the choice between these two processors would depend on the specific requirements and priorities of the device and its users.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 8 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 650 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 96 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x900@90Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 24MP, 16MP + 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2021 October |
Partnumber | MT6877T | T606 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (Gen 4) vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
2
Samsung Exynos 990 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625
3
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs MediaTek Helio G81
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs MediaTek Helio P22
5
MediaTek Helio G200 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400e
6
Samsung Exynos 2400e vs Unisoc Tiger T610
7
HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
8
MediaTek Dimensity 6400 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
9
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 435
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs HiSilicon Kirin 8020