Unisoc Tiger T310 vs Unisoc Tiger T700
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and Unisoc Tiger T700 are processors with different specifications. Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it has a CPU architecture that consists of one Cortex-A75 core clocked at 2 GHz and three Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. It has a total of four cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Additionally, it is manufactured using a 12 nm lithography process.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a slightly different CPU architecture. It features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A5 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of eight cores, which is double the number in the Unisoc Tiger T310. It also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is manufactured using the same 12 nm lithography process as the T310. Furthermore, the T700 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, which indicates its power consumption.
In comparison, the main difference between these two processors lies in the number and setup of their cores. The T310 has four cores, with one powerful Cortex-A75 core for high-performance tasks, while the T700 has eight cores, with two Cortex-A75 cores for higher performance and six Cortex-A5 cores for lower power consumption. This configuration in the T700 allows for more efficient multitasking and handling of multiple processes simultaneously.
Moreover, both processors share the same instruction set and lithography process, implying that they are likely to have similar performance efficiency and power consumption. However, the T700's higher TDP of 10 Watts suggests that it may consume more power compared to the T310.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T310 and T700 ultimately depends on the specific requirements and needs of the user. While the T700 offers a more extensive core configuration, the T310 may still be suitable for tasks that prioritize single-threaded performance.
On the other hand, the Unisoc Tiger T700 has a slightly different CPU architecture. It features two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A5 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor has a total of eight cores, which is double the number in the Unisoc Tiger T310. It also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is manufactured using the same 12 nm lithography process as the T310. Furthermore, the T700 has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts, which indicates its power consumption.
In comparison, the main difference between these two processors lies in the number and setup of their cores. The T310 has four cores, with one powerful Cortex-A75 core for high-performance tasks, while the T700 has eight cores, with two Cortex-A75 cores for higher performance and six Cortex-A5 cores for lower power consumption. This configuration in the T700 allows for more efficient multitasking and handling of multiple processes simultaneously.
Moreover, both processors share the same instruction set and lithography process, implying that they are likely to have similar performance efficiency and power consumption. However, the T700's higher TDP of 10 Watts suggests that it may consume more power compared to the T310.
Ultimately, the choice between the Unisoc Tiger T310 and T700 ultimately depends on the specific requirements and needs of the user. While the T700 offers a more extensive core configuration, the T310 may still be suitable for tasks that prioritize single-threaded performance.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A5 |
Number of cores | 4 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 12 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 4 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1333 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Rogue | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 660 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | 32 |
DirectX | 10 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 3.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 1600x720 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP | 1x 48MP |
Max Video Capture | FullHD@30fps | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 0.3 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.1 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2019 April | 2021 March |
Partnumber | T310 | T700 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Low-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1100
4
HiSilicon Kirin 980 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Unisoc SC9832E
6
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs Samsung Exynos 7420
7
HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8
MediaTek Dimensity 8000 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
9
MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Samsung Exynos 9820
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G vs MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus