MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and the MediaTek Dimensity 920 are two processors with unique specifications.
Beginning with the Tanggula T760 5G, it is built with an architecture that consists of 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This octa-core processor runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 6 nm. With a low TDP of just 5 Watts, it ensures efficient power consumption. Additionally, it also features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities.
On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 by MediaTek sports a slightly different architecture. It consists of 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Like the Tanggula T760 5G, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a 6 nm lithography. However, its TDP is slightly higher at 10 Watts. Similar to the Tanggula T760 5G, it also incorporates an NPU for advanced AI functionality.
Comparing the two processors, it is evident that both offer the same number of cores (8) and instruction set (ARMv8.2-A), as well as a 6 nm lithography. However, there are differences in their core configurations and power consumption. The Tanggula T760 5G has a more efficient setup with 4 Cortex-A76 cores and a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Dimensity 920 has 2 Cortex-A78 cores and a TDP of 10 Watts.
In conclusion, while both processors have their strengths, the Tanggula T760 5G may be a more attractive option for those seeking better power efficiency, thanks to its lower TDP and balanced core configuration. However, the Dimensity 920 might provide better performance in certain tasks with its higher clock speed on the Cortex-A78 cores. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
Beginning with the Tanggula T760 5G, it is built with an architecture that consists of 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. This octa-core processor runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a lithography of 6 nm. With a low TDP of just 5 Watts, it ensures efficient power consumption. Additionally, it also features a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities.
On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 by MediaTek sports a slightly different architecture. It consists of 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Like the Tanggula T760 5G, it operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a 6 nm lithography. However, its TDP is slightly higher at 10 Watts. Similar to the Tanggula T760 5G, it also incorporates an NPU for advanced AI functionality.
Comparing the two processors, it is evident that both offer the same number of cores (8) and instruction set (ARMv8.2-A), as well as a 6 nm lithography. However, there are differences in their core configurations and power consumption. The Tanggula T760 5G has a more efficient setup with 4 Cortex-A76 cores and a TDP of 5 Watts, while the Dimensity 920 has 2 Cortex-A78 cores and a TDP of 10 Watts.
In conclusion, while both processors have their strengths, the Tanggula T760 5G may be a more attractive option for those seeking better power efficiency, thanks to its lower TDP and balanced core configuration. However, the Dimensity 920 might provide better performance in certain tasks with its higher clock speed on the Cortex-A78 cores. Ultimately, the choice between these processors depends on the specific needs and priorities of the user.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 6 |
Shaders | 96 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | MT6877T | T760 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 vs MediaTek Helio P70
2
MediaTek Helio G70 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8400
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Apple A11 Bionic
4
MediaTek Dimensity 9400 vs MediaTek Helio G36
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4s Gen 2 vs MediaTek Helio G200
6
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 3
7
MediaTek Helio G37 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
8
MediaTek Dimensity 9400e vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 670
9
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs Samsung Exynos 990
10
MediaTek Dimensity 9300 vs Apple A15 Bionic