MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two processors with different specifications and features.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it has a total of 4 CPU cores and is built on a 12 nm lithography. The architecture consists of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 boasts a more powerful setup. It comes with 8 CPU cores and operates on a 6 nm lithography. The architecture includes 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T310, it also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
One notable difference between the two processors is the number of transistors. While the Tiger T310 does not provide any information on this aspect, the Dimensity 900 is equipped with 10000 million transistors.
Another differentiating factor is the TDP (Thermal Design Power). The Tiger T310 does not specify its TDP, whereas the Dimensity 900 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates that the Dimensity 900 may consume more power compared to the Tiger T310.
Additionally, the Dimensity 900 comes with a built-in Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This neural processing capability enhances the processor's performance in handling artificial intelligence tasks. The Tiger T310 does not mention any NPU, suggesting that it may not have dedicated neural processing capabilities.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 outshines the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of CPU cores, lithography, number of transistors, TDP, and the inclusion of an NPU. However, it is important to note that the comparison is based solely on the specifications provided. Real-world performance and user experience may vary depending on other factors such as software optimization and overall system integration.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it has a total of 4 CPU cores and is built on a 12 nm lithography. The architecture consists of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 boasts a more powerful setup. It comes with 8 CPU cores and operates on a 6 nm lithography. The architecture includes 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T310, it also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
One notable difference between the two processors is the number of transistors. While the Tiger T310 does not provide any information on this aspect, the Dimensity 900 is equipped with 10000 million transistors.
Another differentiating factor is the TDP (Thermal Design Power). The Tiger T310 does not specify its TDP, whereas the Dimensity 900 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates that the Dimensity 900 may consume more power compared to the Tiger T310.
Additionally, the Dimensity 900 comes with a built-in Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This neural processing capability enhances the processor's performance in handling artificial intelligence tasks. The Tiger T310 does not mention any NPU, suggesting that it may not have dedicated neural processing capabilities.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 outshines the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of CPU cores, lithography, number of transistors, TDP, and the inclusion of an NPU. However, it is important to note that the comparison is based solely on the specifications provided. Real-world performance and user experience may vary depending on other factors such as software optimization and overall system integration.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 660 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 10 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2019 April |
Partnumber | MT6877 | T310 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
2
Apple A17 Pro vs Google Tensor G3
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs MediaTek Helio G36
4
Apple A16 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000
6
Apple A15 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio P70
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 7870
8
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Samsung Exynos 7884B
9
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs MediaTek Dimensity 8020
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs Unisoc SC7731E