MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc Tiger T310
The Unisoc Tiger T310 and MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two processors with different specifications and features.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it has a total of 4 CPU cores and is built on a 12 nm lithography. The architecture consists of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 boasts a more powerful setup. It comes with 8 CPU cores and operates on a 6 nm lithography. The architecture includes 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T310, it also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
One notable difference between the two processors is the number of transistors. While the Tiger T310 does not provide any information on this aspect, the Dimensity 900 is equipped with 10000 million transistors.
Another differentiating factor is the TDP (Thermal Design Power). The Tiger T310 does not specify its TDP, whereas the Dimensity 900 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates that the Dimensity 900 may consume more power compared to the Tiger T310.
Additionally, the Dimensity 900 comes with a built-in Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This neural processing capability enhances the processor's performance in handling artificial intelligence tasks. The Tiger T310 does not mention any NPU, suggesting that it may not have dedicated neural processing capabilities.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 outshines the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of CPU cores, lithography, number of transistors, TDP, and the inclusion of an NPU. However, it is important to note that the comparison is based solely on the specifications provided. Real-world performance and user experience may vary depending on other factors such as software optimization and overall system integration.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T310, it has a total of 4 CPU cores and is built on a 12 nm lithography. The architecture consists of 1x 2 GHz Cortex-A75 and 3x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 boasts a more powerful setup. It comes with 8 CPU cores and operates on a 6 nm lithography. The architecture includes 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Tiger T310, it also supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set.
One notable difference between the two processors is the number of transistors. While the Tiger T310 does not provide any information on this aspect, the Dimensity 900 is equipped with 10000 million transistors.
Another differentiating factor is the TDP (Thermal Design Power). The Tiger T310 does not specify its TDP, whereas the Dimensity 900 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates that the Dimensity 900 may consume more power compared to the Tiger T310.
Additionally, the Dimensity 900 comes with a built-in Neural Processing Unit (NPU). This neural processing capability enhances the processor's performance in handling artificial intelligence tasks. The Tiger T310 does not mention any NPU, suggesting that it may not have dedicated neural processing capabilities.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 outshines the Unisoc Tiger T310 in terms of CPU cores, lithography, number of transistors, TDP, and the inclusion of an NPU. However, it is important to note that the comparison is based solely on the specifications provided. Real-world performance and user experience may vary depending on other factors such as software optimization and overall system integration.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
1x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 3x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1333 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8300 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 660 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 2 |
Shaders | 64 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 10 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1600x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 8MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2019 April |
Partnumber | MT6877 | T310 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G
2
Apple A10 Fusion vs MediaTek Helio G85
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs MediaTek Helio P95
5
Apple A12 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G80
6
Samsung Exynos 9820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 800
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 vs HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G
8
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
9
Samsung Exynos 980 vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
10
Samsung Exynos 9609 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G