MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two processors that have noteworthy specifications.
Beginning with the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it boasts an octa-core design with 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, this processor delivers efficient performance. Moreover, it is built on a 6 nm lithography process, making it power-efficient. The TDP of this processor is 5 Watts, which assists in optimal power consumption. Additionally, it features a neural processing unit (NPU) that enhances AI-related tasks.
Now, let's delve into the specifications of the MediaTek Dimensity 900. This processor also comprises eight cores, with 2 Cortex-A78 cores running at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Similarly, it possesses an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility and efficient performance. Manufactured using a 6 nm lithography process, this processor offers power-saving capabilities. Notably, it houses a whopping 10000 million transistors, which aids in enhanced performance. The Dimensity 900 has a TDP of 10 Watts and features an NPU for accelerated AI tasks.
Comparing these two processors, we can observe differences in their core configurations. The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G features 4 Cortex-A76 and 4 Cortex-A55 cores, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 consists of 2 Cortex-A78 and 6 Cortex-A55 cores. Additionally, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its higher transistor count of 10000 million.
Both processors are built on the same 6 nm lithography process and offer an NPU for AI tasks. However, they differ in terms of power consumption, with the Tanggula T760 5G having a TDP of 5 Watts compared to the Dimensity 900's 10 Watt TDP.
In conclusion, while both the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 900 possess impressive specifications, they differ in core configurations, transistor count, and TDP. These variations may impact their performance and power consumption in different device applications.
Beginning with the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it boasts an octa-core design with 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, this processor delivers efficient performance. Moreover, it is built on a 6 nm lithography process, making it power-efficient. The TDP of this processor is 5 Watts, which assists in optimal power consumption. Additionally, it features a neural processing unit (NPU) that enhances AI-related tasks.
Now, let's delve into the specifications of the MediaTek Dimensity 900. This processor also comprises eight cores, with 2 Cortex-A78 cores running at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Similarly, it possesses an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility and efficient performance. Manufactured using a 6 nm lithography process, this processor offers power-saving capabilities. Notably, it houses a whopping 10000 million transistors, which aids in enhanced performance. The Dimensity 900 has a TDP of 10 Watts and features an NPU for accelerated AI tasks.
Comparing these two processors, we can observe differences in their core configurations. The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G features 4 Cortex-A76 and 4 Cortex-A55 cores, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 consists of 2 Cortex-A78 and 6 Cortex-A55 cores. Additionally, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its higher transistor count of 10000 million.
Both processors are built on the same 6 nm lithography process and offer an NPU for AI tasks. However, they differ in terms of power consumption, with the Tanggula T760 5G having a TDP of 5 Watts compared to the Dimensity 900's 10 Watt TDP.
In conclusion, while both the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 900 possess impressive specifications, they differ in core configurations, transistor count, and TDP. These variations may impact their performance and power consumption in different device applications.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 6 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | MT6877 | T760 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G200 vs Apple A13 Bionic
2
Unisoc T820 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8350 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
5
Samsung Exynos 8895 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
6
MediaTek Dimensity 7200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 980
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 685 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 3
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 695
9
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Apple A12 Bionic
10
MediaTek Dimensity 1000L vs Unisoc Tiger T620