MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two processors that have noteworthy specifications.
Beginning with the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it boasts an octa-core design with 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, this processor delivers efficient performance. Moreover, it is built on a 6 nm lithography process, making it power-efficient. The TDP of this processor is 5 Watts, which assists in optimal power consumption. Additionally, it features a neural processing unit (NPU) that enhances AI-related tasks.
Now, let's delve into the specifications of the MediaTek Dimensity 900. This processor also comprises eight cores, with 2 Cortex-A78 cores running at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Similarly, it possesses an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility and efficient performance. Manufactured using a 6 nm lithography process, this processor offers power-saving capabilities. Notably, it houses a whopping 10000 million transistors, which aids in enhanced performance. The Dimensity 900 has a TDP of 10 Watts and features an NPU for accelerated AI tasks.
Comparing these two processors, we can observe differences in their core configurations. The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G features 4 Cortex-A76 and 4 Cortex-A55 cores, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 consists of 2 Cortex-A78 and 6 Cortex-A55 cores. Additionally, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its higher transistor count of 10000 million.
Both processors are built on the same 6 nm lithography process and offer an NPU for AI tasks. However, they differ in terms of power consumption, with the Tanggula T760 5G having a TDP of 5 Watts compared to the Dimensity 900's 10 Watt TDP.
In conclusion, while both the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 900 possess impressive specifications, they differ in core configurations, transistor count, and TDP. These variations may impact their performance and power consumption in different device applications.
Beginning with the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G, it boasts an octa-core design with 4 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz and 4 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz. With an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, this processor delivers efficient performance. Moreover, it is built on a 6 nm lithography process, making it power-efficient. The TDP of this processor is 5 Watts, which assists in optimal power consumption. Additionally, it features a neural processing unit (NPU) that enhances AI-related tasks.
Now, let's delve into the specifications of the MediaTek Dimensity 900. This processor also comprises eight cores, with 2 Cortex-A78 cores running at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Similarly, it possesses an ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility and efficient performance. Manufactured using a 6 nm lithography process, this processor offers power-saving capabilities. Notably, it houses a whopping 10000 million transistors, which aids in enhanced performance. The Dimensity 900 has a TDP of 10 Watts and features an NPU for accelerated AI tasks.
Comparing these two processors, we can observe differences in their core configurations. The Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G features 4 Cortex-A76 and 4 Cortex-A55 cores, while the MediaTek Dimensity 900 consists of 2 Cortex-A78 and 6 Cortex-A55 cores. Additionally, the Dimensity 900 stands out with its higher transistor count of 10000 million.
Both processors are built on the same 6 nm lithography process and offer an NPU for AI tasks. However, they differ in terms of power consumption, with the Tanggula T760 5G having a TDP of 5 Watts compared to the Dimensity 900's 10 Watt TDP.
In conclusion, while both the Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G and MediaTek Dimensity 900 possess impressive specifications, they differ in core configurations, transistor count, and TDP. These variations may impact their performance and power consumption in different device applications.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 5 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G57 MP6 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 6 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.7 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.5 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2021 February |
Partnumber | MT6877 | T760 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Samsung Exynos 980 vs HiSilicon Kirin 810
2
MediaTek Helio G35 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
3
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Apple A14 Bionic
4
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835
5
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
6
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
7
MediaTek Helio P35 vs HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Samsung Exynos 7870
9
Apple A17 Pro vs Unisoc SC9863A
10
MediaTek Dimensity 6100 Plus vs Apple A10X Fusion