MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc SC9863A
The Unisoc SC9863A and the MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two processors with distinct specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it features an architecture consisting of four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and an additional four Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.2 GHz. The processor has a total of eight cores, making it suitable for multitasking and handling various applications. Its Instruction Set is ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software. With a lithography of 28 nm, it offers decent energy efficiency, requiring a TDP of 3 watts. Additionally, the SC9863A boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances artificial intelligence capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 packs more powerful specifications. It is equipped with an architecture comprising two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, and an additional six Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the SC9863A, this processor also has a total of eight cores, ensuring smooth performance. With an Instruction Set of ARMv8.2-A, it guarantees software compatibility. The Dimensity 900 impresses with a lithography of 6 nm, significantly reducing power consumption and improving overall efficiency. It also boasts an impressive 10 billion transistors, indicating higher processing capabilities. Furthermore, its TDP is 10 watts, which may require more power but translates to potentially better performance. Like the SC9863A, the Dimensity 900 also comes with a Neural Processing Unit, emphasizing its AI capabilities.
In summary, while the Unisoc SC9863A offers decent specifications suitable for regular tasks, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 takes it a step further with more powerful cores, lower lithography, a larger number of transistors, and a higher TDP. This makes the Dimensity 900 a superior choice for users who require more processing power and efficiency. However, the specific needs of the user should be considered when choosing between these two processors.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9863A, it features an architecture consisting of four Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.6 GHz and an additional four Cortex-A55 cores running at 1.2 GHz. The processor has a total of eight cores, making it suitable for multitasking and handling various applications. Its Instruction Set is ARMv8.2-A, ensuring compatibility with a wide range of software. With a lithography of 28 nm, it offers decent energy efficiency, requiring a TDP of 3 watts. Additionally, the SC9863A boasts a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances artificial intelligence capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 packs more powerful specifications. It is equipped with an architecture comprising two Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, and an additional six Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. Similar to the SC9863A, this processor also has a total of eight cores, ensuring smooth performance. With an Instruction Set of ARMv8.2-A, it guarantees software compatibility. The Dimensity 900 impresses with a lithography of 6 nm, significantly reducing power consumption and improving overall efficiency. It also boasts an impressive 10 billion transistors, indicating higher processing capabilities. Furthermore, its TDP is 10 watts, which may require more power but translates to potentially better performance. Like the SC9863A, the Dimensity 900 also comes with a Neural Processing Unit, emphasizing its AI capabilities.
In summary, while the Unisoc SC9863A offers decent specifications suitable for regular tasks, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 takes it a step further with more powerful cores, lower lithography, a larger number of transistors, and a higher TDP. This makes the Dimensity 900 a superior choice for users who require more processing power and efficiency. However, the specific needs of the user should be considered when choosing between these two processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2018 November |
Partnumber | MT6877 | SC9863A |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
2
MediaTek Helio P65 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
3
MediaTek Dimensity 8020 vs MediaTek Helio G35
4
Samsung Exynos 9611 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Apple A17 Pro
6
HiSilicon Kirin 960 vs Unisoc Tiger T618
7
MediaTek Helio P35 vs MediaTek Dimensity 820
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
9
MediaTek Helio G85 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
10
Apple A13 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9825