MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs Unisoc SC9863A
The Unisoc SC9863A and MediaTek Dimensity 820 are two processors with distinct specifications and capabilities. The Unisoc SC9863A has an architecture consisting of 4x 1.6 GHz Cortex-A55 and 4x 1.2 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, offering a total of 8 cores. Its instruction set is ARMv8.2-A, and it operates on a lithography of 28 nm. The TDP (Thermal Design Power) for the SC9863A is 3 Watts. Moreover, it possesses a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for AI-related tasks.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 features an architecture comprising 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, delivering a total of 8 cores. Similar to the SC9863A, it also utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it operates on a more advanced 7 nm lithography. The TDP for the Dimensity 820 is 10 Watts. Additionally, it incorporates an NPU for neural processing tasks.
Comparing the specifications, we observe a clear difference in the clock speeds and the lithography between the two processors. The Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 820 have significantly higher clock speeds (2.6 GHz) compared to the Cortex-A55 cores in the SC9863A (1.6 GHz). This implies that the Dimensity 820 can handle more demanding tasks and offer improved performance.
Moreover, the Dimensity 820's 7 nm lithography provides better power efficiency and thermal management compared to the SC9863A's older 28 nm lithography. This contributes to a more power-efficient and cooler operation, making the Dimensity 820 an appealing choice for devices where power optimization is crucial.
Despite these differences, both processors feature the same instruction set and provide NPUs for AI-related tasks. However, the Dimensity 820's superior clock speeds and more advanced lithography make it a more powerful and efficient processor overall.
In summary, while the Unisoc SC9863A and MediaTek Dimensity 820 both offer multiple CPU cores and NPUs, the Dimensity 820 stands out with its higher clock speeds and advanced lithography. These factors contribute to its improved performance and power efficiency, making it a more compelling choice for high-performance devices.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 820 features an architecture comprising 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, delivering a total of 8 cores. Similar to the SC9863A, it also utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, it operates on a more advanced 7 nm lithography. The TDP for the Dimensity 820 is 10 Watts. Additionally, it incorporates an NPU for neural processing tasks.
Comparing the specifications, we observe a clear difference in the clock speeds and the lithography between the two processors. The Cortex-A76 cores in the Dimensity 820 have significantly higher clock speeds (2.6 GHz) compared to the Cortex-A55 cores in the SC9863A (1.6 GHz). This implies that the Dimensity 820 can handle more demanding tasks and offer improved performance.
Moreover, the Dimensity 820's 7 nm lithography provides better power efficiency and thermal management compared to the SC9863A's older 28 nm lithography. This contributes to a more power-efficient and cooler operation, making the Dimensity 820 an appealing choice for devices where power optimization is crucial.
Despite these differences, both processors feature the same instruction set and provide NPUs for AI-related tasks. However, the Dimensity 820's superior clock speeds and more advanced lithography make it a more powerful and efficient processor overall.
In summary, while the Unisoc SC9863A and MediaTek Dimensity 820 both offer multiple CPU cores and NPUs, the Dimensity 820 stands out with its higher clock speeds and advanced lithography. These factors contribute to its improved performance and power efficiency, making it a more compelling choice for high-performance devices.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.6 GHz – Cortex-A55 4x 1.2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | 3 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 4 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Imagination PowerVR GE8322 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Rogue |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 550 MHz |
Execution units | 5 | 4 |
Shaders | 80 | 128 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 3.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2160x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 16MP + 1x 5MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 May | 2018 November |
Partnumber | MT6875 | SC9863A |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Apple A10X Fusion
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs Samsung Exynos 990
3
Google Tensor G2 vs Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G
4
HiSilicon Kirin 710F vs MediaTek Dimensity 6020
5
Samsung Exynos 2100 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
6
MediaTek Dimensity 8100 vs HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G
7
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 632
8
MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Apple A14 Bionic
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
10
MediaTek Helio A25 vs Unisoc Tiger T612