MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs Unisoc SC9832E
The Unisoc SC9832E and MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two processors with different specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it is built on a 28 nm lithography and consists of four Cortex-A53 cores with a clock speed of 1.4 GHz. It follows the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts. Although it is a relatively older processor, it still offers adequate performance for basic tasks and low-power devices.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is a more advanced processor. It utilizes a 6 nm lithography and incorporates a mix of cores for better performance. It consists of two high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and six energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This configuration not only provides a higher clock speed but also enables better power efficiency. The Dimensity 900 follows the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP of 10 Watts. It also boasts a neural processing unit (NPU), which enhances its AI processing capabilities.
Additionally, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a higher transistor count compared to the Unisoc SC9832E, with 10,000 million transistors. This allows for more advanced features and better overall performance.
While both processors have their strengths, the Dimensity 900 clearly outperforms the SC9832E in terms of power, performance, and advanced features. The Dimensity 900's smaller lithography, higher clock speed, mixed core architecture, and inclusion of an NPU make it a more capable choice for modern high-performance devices, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better AI capabilities.
In conclusion, if you are looking for a processor with better performance and advanced features, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is the superior choice. However, if you require a more budget-friendly option or have specific power consumption requirements, the Unisoc SC9832E can still be a viable choice for less demanding tasks.
Starting with the Unisoc SC9832E, it is built on a 28 nm lithography and consists of four Cortex-A53 cores with a clock speed of 1.4 GHz. It follows the ARMv8-A instruction set and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 7 Watts. Although it is a relatively older processor, it still offers adequate performance for basic tasks and low-power devices.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is a more advanced processor. It utilizes a 6 nm lithography and incorporates a mix of cores for better performance. It consists of two high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and six energy-efficient Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This configuration not only provides a higher clock speed but also enables better power efficiency. The Dimensity 900 follows the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and has a TDP of 10 Watts. It also boasts a neural processing unit (NPU), which enhances its AI processing capabilities.
Additionally, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 has a higher transistor count compared to the Unisoc SC9832E, with 10,000 million transistors. This allows for more advanced features and better overall performance.
While both processors have their strengths, the Dimensity 900 clearly outperforms the SC9832E in terms of power, performance, and advanced features. The Dimensity 900's smaller lithography, higher clock speed, mixed core architecture, and inclusion of an NPU make it a more capable choice for modern high-performance devices, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better AI capabilities.
In conclusion, if you are looking for a processor with better performance and advanced features, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 is the superior choice. However, if you require a more budget-friendly option or have specific power consumption requirements, the Unisoc SC9832E can still be a viable choice for less demanding tasks.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 28 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 7 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 2 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 667 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 680 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 1 |
Shaders | 64 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 13MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2018 |
Partnumber | MT6877 | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 vs Apple A14 Bionic
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs Google Tensor G1
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G
4
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs MediaTek Helio G88
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1300 vs MediaTek Helio G37
6
HiSilicon Kirin 810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G
7
Samsung Exynos 1330 vs MediaTek Helio G90T
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 Plus vs Unisoc SC9832E
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs MediaTek Dimensity 700
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus vs MediaTek Dimensity 8200