MediaTek Dimensity 900 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
The MediaTek Dimensity 900 and Dimensity 920 are two powerful processors that offer impressive specifications for mobile devices. Both processors are packed with features designed to enhance performance and deliver an exceptional user experience. Let's take a closer look at their specifications to compare them side by side.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, both processors share the same setup. They both feature 2 high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz for the Dimensity 900 and 2.5 GHz for the Dimensity 920. Additionally, they both have 6 power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. This ensures a good balance between performance and energy efficiency.
Moving on to other important specifications, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A Instruction Set that provides compatibility with a wide range of software. They are also built on the same 6 nm lithography, which ensures efficient power consumption and heat management.
The number of cores is identical for both processors, with 8 cores in total. This allows for seamless multitasking and smooth performance, even when running demanding applications or games.
Another important aspect to consider is the TDP or thermal design power. Both the Dimensity 900 and Dimensity 920 have a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating that they are designed to be power-efficient without compromising on performance.
In terms of neural processing, both processors feature an NPU or Neural Processing Unit. This specialized hardware accelerates tasks related to artificial intelligence, machine learning, and image processing, providing fast and efficient performance in these areas.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 and Dimensity 920 share many similar specifications, including CPU cores, architecture, lithography, TDP, and neural processing capabilities. However, the Dimensity 920 offers a slightly higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, which may result in a minor performance boost.
Both processors are excellent choices for smartphones and other mobile devices, delivering powerful performance, energy efficiency, and AI capabilities.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, both processors share the same setup. They both feature 2 high-performance Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz for the Dimensity 900 and 2.5 GHz for the Dimensity 920. Additionally, they both have 6 power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. This ensures a good balance between performance and energy efficiency.
Moving on to other important specifications, both processors utilize the ARMv8.2-A Instruction Set that provides compatibility with a wide range of software. They are also built on the same 6 nm lithography, which ensures efficient power consumption and heat management.
The number of cores is identical for both processors, with 8 cores in total. This allows for seamless multitasking and smooth performance, even when running demanding applications or games.
Another important aspect to consider is the TDP or thermal design power. Both the Dimensity 900 and Dimensity 920 have a TDP of 10 Watts, indicating that they are designed to be power-efficient without compromising on performance.
In terms of neural processing, both processors feature an NPU or Neural Processing Unit. This specialized hardware accelerates tasks related to artificial intelligence, machine learning, and image processing, providing fast and efficient performance in these areas.
Overall, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 and Dimensity 920 share many similar specifications, including CPU cores, architecture, lithography, TDP, and neural processing capabilities. However, the Dimensity 920 offers a slightly higher clock speed for its high-performance cores, which may result in a minor performance boost.
Both processors are excellent choices for smartphones and other mobile devices, delivering powerful performance, energy efficiency, and AI capabilities.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 3200 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G68 MP4 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 900 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 4 | 4 |
Shaders | 64 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.0 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 1 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6877 | MT6877T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Unisoc Tanggula T740 5G vs Apple A11 Bionic
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 680
3
MediaTek Dimensity 6020 vs Unisoc Tanggula T770 5G
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 vs MediaTek Helio P65
5
Samsung Exynos 990 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
6
Samsung Exynos 7884B vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 480
7
MediaTek Helio G80 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1
8
Apple A12 Bionic vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
9
MediaTek Helio G85 vs MediaTek Helio G37
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930