HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G and the Unisoc Tiger T610 are both processors used in smartphones and other mobile devices. While they have some similarities in terms of the number of CPU cores and instruction set, there are notable differences in their specifications.
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G is built on a 7 nm lithography, which means it has a more advanced manufacturing process compared to the Unisoc Tiger T610's 12 nm lithography. This suggests that the Kirin 985 5G may be more power-efficient and capable of delivering better performance while consuming less energy.
In terms of CPU architecture, the Kirin 985 5G features a combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. It has one high-performance Cortex-A76 core clocked at 2.58 GHz, three more Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, and four power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.84 GHz. On the other hand, the Tiger T610 consists of two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at the same frequency. The Kirin 985 5G's Cortex-A76 cores are generally considered to be more powerful than the Cortex-A75 cores found in the Tiger T610.
When it comes to power consumption, the Kirin 985 5G has a thermal design power (TDP) of 6 Watts, while the Tiger T610 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates that the Kirin 985 5G may be more energy-efficient compared to the Tiger T610, resulting in better battery life for devices equipped with the former processor.
In terms of neural processing capabilities, the Kirin 985 5G comes with the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny neural processing units, which are based on HUAWEI's Da Vinci architecture. The Tiger T610, on the other hand, does not specify any neural processing units.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T610 in terms of lithography, CPU architecture, and power consumption. However, it's essential to consider other factors such as overall device optimization and real-world performance before making a final judgment on which processor is superior in practice.
The HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G is built on a 7 nm lithography, which means it has a more advanced manufacturing process compared to the Unisoc Tiger T610's 12 nm lithography. This suggests that the Kirin 985 5G may be more power-efficient and capable of delivering better performance while consuming less energy.
In terms of CPU architecture, the Kirin 985 5G features a combination of Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55 cores. It has one high-performance Cortex-A76 core clocked at 2.58 GHz, three more Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz, and four power-efficient Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 1.84 GHz. On the other hand, the Tiger T610 consists of two Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and six Cortex-A55 cores clocked at the same frequency. The Kirin 985 5G's Cortex-A76 cores are generally considered to be more powerful than the Cortex-A75 cores found in the Tiger T610.
When it comes to power consumption, the Kirin 985 5G has a thermal design power (TDP) of 6 Watts, while the Tiger T610 has a TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates that the Kirin 985 5G may be more energy-efficient compared to the Tiger T610, resulting in better battery life for devices equipped with the former processor.
In terms of neural processing capabilities, the Kirin 985 5G comes with the Ascend D110 Lite and Ascend D100 Tiny neural processing units, which are based on HUAWEI's Da Vinci architecture. The Tiger T610, on the other hand, does not specify any neural processing units.
In summary, the HiSilicon Kirin 985 5G outperforms the Unisoc Tiger T610 in terms of lithography, CPU architecture, and power consumption. However, it's essential to consider other factors such as overall device optimization and real-world performance before making a final judgment on which processor is superior in practice.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 1x 2.58 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 6 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite + Ascend D100 Tiny, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 3.0 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G77 MP8 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 700 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 8 | 2 |
Shaders | 128 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 3120x1440 | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fp | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 1.4 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.0 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 2 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | Hi6290 | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000
2
MediaTek Dimensity 6080 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
3
Samsung Exynos 990 vs MediaTek Dimensity 810
4
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs Unisoc Tiger T612
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G
6
Unisoc Tanggula T760 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9610
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G vs HiSilicon Kirin 710A
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G vs MediaTek Dimensity 720
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs MediaTek Dimensity 8000