MediaTek Dimensity 8200 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G

VS
Which processor is better? We compared MediaTek Dimensity 8200 with Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Prime)
1x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 (Kryo 475 Gold)
1x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 (Kryo 475 Silver)
Number of cores 8 8
Instruction Set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
Lithography 4 nm 7 nm
TDP 6 Watt 5 Watt
Neural Processing MediaTek APU 580 Qualcomm Hexagon 696

Memory (RAM)

Max amount up to 16 GB up to 12 GB
Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
Memory frequency 3200 MHz 2133 MHz
Memory-bus 4x16 bit 2x16 bit

Storage

Storage specification UFS 3.1

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G610 MP6 Adreno 620
GPU Architecture Valhall Adreno 600
GPU frequency 950 MHz 750 MHz
Execution units 6 3
Shaders 96 192
DirectX 12
OpenCL API 2.0 2.0
OpenGL API ES 3.2 ES 3.2
Vulkan API 1.2 1.1

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution 2520x1080
Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 192MP, 2x 22MP
Max Video Capture 4K@60fps 4K@30fps
Video codec support AV1
H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP9
H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP8
VP9

Wireless

4G network Yes Yes
5G network Yes Yes
Peak Download Speed 4.7 Gbps 3.7 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed 2.5 Gbps 1.6 Gbps
Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) 6 (802.11ax)
Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
Satellite navigation BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
NavIC
QZSS
BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
NavIC
QZSS
SBAS

Supplemental Information

Launch Date 2022 Quarter 4 2020 Quarter 2
Partnumber MT6896Z SM7250-AC
Vertical Segment Mobiles Mobiles
Positioning Flagship Mid-end

AnTuTu 10

Total Score
Dimensity 8200
838573
Snapdragon 768G
441857

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score
Dimensity 8200
989
Snapdragon 768G
704

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score
Dimensity 8200
4029
Snapdragon 768G
1988