MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
The MediaTek Dimensity 820 and the MediaTek Dimensity 900 are two powerful processors with their own unique specifications.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 820, this processor features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Built on a 7 nm lithography, this processor is designed for efficient performance with a TDP of 10 Watts. It also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 comes with a slightly different architecture. It is equipped with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores as well. Similar to the Dimensity 820, it runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 900 has a smaller lithography of 6 nm, offering potentially improved power efficiency. Interestingly, it boasts a high number of transistors at 10000 million, indicating a greater level of processing power. The TDP for this processor is also 10 Watts, ensuring it operates within a reasonable power envelope. The Dimensity 900 also features an NPU for AI-related tasks.
In comparison, while both processors share the same number of cores and instruction set, they differ in their core architecture. The Dimensity 820 has faster Cortex-A76 cores, while the Dimensity 900 incorporates more powerful Cortex-A78 cores. Additionally, the Dimensity 900 benefits from a more advanced 6 nm lithography and a higher number of transistors, potentially resulting in increased performance and efficiency. However, the Dimensity 820 has the advantage of the same level of performance at a reduced power consumption due to its 7 nm lithography. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and preferences in terms of power efficiency and processing power.
Starting with the MediaTek Dimensity 820, this processor features an architecture consisting of 4x 2.6 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 4x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. It has a total of 8 cores and operates on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. Built on a 7 nm lithography, this processor is designed for efficient performance with a TDP of 10 Watts. It also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 900 comes with a slightly different architecture. It is equipped with 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, totaling 8 cores as well. Similar to the Dimensity 820, it runs on the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, the Dimensity 900 has a smaller lithography of 6 nm, offering potentially improved power efficiency. Interestingly, it boasts a high number of transistors at 10000 million, indicating a greater level of processing power. The TDP for this processor is also 10 Watts, ensuring it operates within a reasonable power envelope. The Dimensity 900 also features an NPU for AI-related tasks.
In comparison, while both processors share the same number of cores and instruction set, they differ in their core architecture. The Dimensity 820 has faster Cortex-A76 cores, while the Dimensity 900 incorporates more powerful Cortex-A78 cores. Additionally, the Dimensity 900 benefits from a more advanced 6 nm lithography and a higher number of transistors, potentially resulting in increased performance and efficiency. However, the Dimensity 820 has the advantage of the same level of performance at a reduced power consumption due to its 7 nm lithography. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on specific requirements and preferences in terms of power efficiency and processing power.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 10000 million | |
TDP | 10 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 16 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP5 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 650 MHz | 900 MHz |
Execution units | 5 | 4 |
Shaders | 80 | 64 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 80MP, 1x 32MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 May | 2021 Quarter 1 |
Partnumber | MT6875 | MT6877 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G25 vs MediaTek Dimensity 930
2
Apple A13 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus
3
Google Tensor G3 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
4
MediaTek Helio G70 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 690
5
MediaTek Helio G96 vs Samsung Exynos 850
6
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 675
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 1 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
9
Unisoc Tiger T710 vs Apple A14 Bionic
10
Samsung Exynos 7420 vs Unisoc SC9832E