MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T616
The Unisoc Tiger T616 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 are two processors with different specifications and features. Let's compare them based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T616, it features an architecture of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores and an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A. It is built using a 12 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 810, it runs on an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T616, it has a total of 8 cores and an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A. However, the Dimensity 810 is manufactured using a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. In terms of transistor count, it has 12000 million transistors. Additionally, it has a TDP of 8 Watts and is equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI processing capabilities.
Comparing the two processors, the Dimensity 810 has a higher clock speed in both its high-performance and efficiency cores compared to the Tiger T616. This suggests that the Dimensity 810 may offer better performance in tasks that require higher processing power. Moreover, the Dimensity 810's use of a 6 nm lithography process indicates improved power efficiency, as it requires less power (8 Watts) compared to the Tiger T616's 10 Watts. The inclusion of the NPU in the Dimensity 810 also suggests better AI processing capabilities.
However, it's important to note that specifications alone do not solely determine a processor's performance. Other factors such as software optimization, thermal management, and system implementation also play crucial roles. Therefore, it is recommended to consider real-world benchmarks and reviews to get a more comprehensive understanding of the performance and capabilities of these processors.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T616, it features an architecture of 2x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores and 6x 1.8 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. This processor has a total of 8 cores and an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A. It is built using a 12 nm lithography process and has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 810, it runs on an architecture of 2x 2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x 2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores. Similar to the Unisoc Tiger T616, it has a total of 8 cores and an instruction set of ARMv8.2-A. However, the Dimensity 810 is manufactured using a more advanced 6 nm lithography process. In terms of transistor count, it has 12000 million transistors. Additionally, it has a TDP of 8 Watts and is equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for enhanced AI processing capabilities.
Comparing the two processors, the Dimensity 810 has a higher clock speed in both its high-performance and efficiency cores compared to the Tiger T616. This suggests that the Dimensity 810 may offer better performance in tasks that require higher processing power. Moreover, the Dimensity 810's use of a 6 nm lithography process indicates improved power efficiency, as it requires less power (8 Watts) compared to the Tiger T616's 10 Watts. The inclusion of the NPU in the Dimensity 810 also suggests better AI processing capabilities.
However, it's important to note that specifications alone do not solely determine a processor's performance. Other factors such as software optimization, thermal management, and system implementation also play crucial roles. Therefore, it is recommended to consider real-world benchmarks and reviews to get a more comprehensive understanding of the performance and capabilities of these processors.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 8 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G57 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 750 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 1 |
Shaders | 32 | 16 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2021 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | T616 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1000 Plus vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
2
Apple A17 Pro vs Unisoc SC9863A
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 Plus
4
Google Tensor G1 vs Samsung Exynos 2200
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G vs Unisoc Tiger T700
6
MediaTek Dimensity 820 vs MediaTek Helio P90
7
MediaTek Helio G85 vs MediaTek Helio G35
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
9
Unisoc SC9832E vs Apple A16 Bionic
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 vs Samsung Exynos 1380