MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs Unisoc Tiger T610
The Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 are two processors with distinct specifications. Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T610, it features a dual-cluster CPU architecture with 2 Cortex-A75 cores clocked at 1.8 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores also clocked at 1.8 GHz. This processor utilizes the ARMv8.2-A instruction set and is built on a 12 nm lithography process. Additionally, it has a thermal design power (TDP) of 10 Watts.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 boasts a similar dual-cluster CPU architecture but with higher clock speeds. It includes 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Like the T610, it also employs the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, what sets it apart is its smaller 6 nm lithography process and the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). Furthermore, it has a TDP of 8 Watts and contains approximately 12 billion transistors.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have eight cores. However, the Dimensity 810 offers higher clock speeds on both its high-performance and efficiency cores. This suggests that it may offer a better overall performance compared to the Tiger T610. Additionally, the Dimensity 810's smaller 6 nm lithography process may result in improved power efficiency and potentially better heat dissipation.
Moreover, the Dimensity 810's inclusion of an NPU indicates that it may have better artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities when compared to the Tiger T610. The NPU enables more efficient and specialized processing of AI-related tasks, such as image recognition and voice assistants.
In conclusion, while both the Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 have eight CPU cores and employ the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the Dimensity 810 offers higher clock speeds, a smaller lithography process, and includes an NPU. These specifications indicate that the Dimensity 810 may possess superior overall performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities.
On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 boasts a similar dual-cluster CPU architecture but with higher clock speeds. It includes 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. Like the T610, it also employs the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. However, what sets it apart is its smaller 6 nm lithography process and the inclusion of a Neural Processing Unit (NPU). Furthermore, it has a TDP of 8 Watts and contains approximately 12 billion transistors.
In terms of CPU cores and architecture, both processors have eight cores. However, the Dimensity 810 offers higher clock speeds on both its high-performance and efficiency cores. This suggests that it may offer a better overall performance compared to the Tiger T610. Additionally, the Dimensity 810's smaller 6 nm lithography process may result in improved power efficiency and potentially better heat dissipation.
Moreover, the Dimensity 810's inclusion of an NPU indicates that it may have better artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities when compared to the Tiger T610. The NPU enables more efficient and specialized processing of AI-related tasks, such as image recognition and voice assistants.
In conclusion, while both the Unisoc Tiger T610 and MediaTek Dimensity 810 have eight CPU cores and employ the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, the Dimensity 810 offers higher clock speeds, a smaller lithography process, and includes an NPU. These specifications indicate that the Dimensity 810 may possess superior overall performance, power efficiency, and AI capabilities.
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 12 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 8 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 614.4 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 2 |
Shaders | 32 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 32MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2019 June |
Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | T610 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G36 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
2
MediaTek Dimensity 7025 vs Samsung Exynos 1580
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 vs Samsung Exynos 990
4
Google Tensor G1 vs MediaTek Helio P90
5
MediaTek Dimensity 1200 vs MediaTek Helio G200
6
Apple A16 Bionic vs Samsung Exynos 9611
7
MediaTek Dimensity 9200 Plus vs Apple M4 (iPad)
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1300
9
HiSilicon Kirin 8000 vs Samsung Exynos 1280
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Plus