MediaTek Dimensity 810 vs MediaTek Dimensity 920
The MediaTek Dimensity 810 and Dimensity 920 processors are both powerful and feature-rich options for mobile devices. While they share some similarities in their specifications, there are also notable differences that set them apart.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Dimensity 810 is equipped with 2 Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 boasts 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at the same 2.0 GHz frequency. This signifies that the Dimensity 920 has more powerful cores, which can potentially provide better overall performance and speed.
Both processors feature 8 cores in total and employ the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software.
In terms of lithography, both the Dimensity 810 and Dimensity 920 are manufactured using a 6 nm process, giving them similar levels of energy efficiency and heat management capabilities.
While the Dimensity 810 has a thermal design power (TDP) rating of 8 Watts, the Dimensity 920 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 may consume slightly more power and generate more heat during operation.
Both processors are equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enables advanced AI capabilities and enhances tasks related to machine learning and image processing. This makes them suitable choices for devices that rely heavily on AI-driven features.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 and Dimensity 920 processors offer powerful performance and efficient energy consumption. The Dimensity 810 features slightly lower clock speeds and a lower TDP rating, while the Dimensity 920 boasts faster cores and a slightly higher power consumption. Both processors share the same instruction set, lithography, and NPU capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the device and its users.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Dimensity 810 is equipped with 2 Cortex-A76 cores running at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. On the other hand, the Dimensity 920 boasts 2 Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at the same 2.0 GHz frequency. This signifies that the Dimensity 920 has more powerful cores, which can potentially provide better overall performance and speed.
Both processors feature 8 cores in total and employ the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, ensuring compatibility with modern software.
In terms of lithography, both the Dimensity 810 and Dimensity 920 are manufactured using a 6 nm process, giving them similar levels of energy efficiency and heat management capabilities.
While the Dimensity 810 has a thermal design power (TDP) rating of 8 Watts, the Dimensity 920 has a slightly higher TDP of 10 Watts. This indicates that the Dimensity 920 may consume slightly more power and generate more heat during operation.
Both processors are equipped with a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enables advanced AI capabilities and enhances tasks related to machine learning and image processing. This makes them suitable choices for devices that rely heavily on AI-driven features.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 810 and Dimensity 920 processors offer powerful performance and efficient energy consumption. The Dimensity 810 features slightly lower clock speeds and a lower TDP rating, while the Dimensity 920 boasts faster cores and a slightly higher power consumption. Both processors share the same instruction set, lithography, and NPU capabilities. Ultimately, the choice between these processors would depend on the specific needs and priorities of the device and its users.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 6 nm | 6 nm |
Number of transistors | 12000 million | |
TDP | 8 Watt | 10 Watt |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 16 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR5 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 3200 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 4x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | UFS 3.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP2 | Mali-G68 MP4 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Valhall |
GPU frequency | 950 MHz | 950 MHz |
Execution units | 2 | 4 |
Shaders | 32 | 96 |
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2520x1080@120Hz |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP |
Max Video Capture | 2K@30FPS | 4K@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 2.77 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 1.2 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 6 (802.11ax) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS NavIC QZSS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2021 Quarter 3 | 2021 Quarter 3 |
Partnumber | MT6833V/PNZA, MT6833P | MT6877T |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9000E 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
3
HiSilicon Kirin 990 4G vs MediaTek Helio P60
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Plus Gen 2 vs Unisoc Tiger T606
5
MediaTek Dimensity 7050 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
6
HiSilicon Kirin 935 vs HiSilicon Kirin 990 5G
7
Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 vs MediaTek Helio P65
8
Apple A11 Bionic vs MediaTek Helio G25
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 782G vs MediaTek Helio G88
10
Samsung Exynos 990 vs MediaTek Helio P35