HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G vs Samsung Exynos 9610
Which processor is better? We compared HiSilicon Kirin 820 5G with Samsung Exynos 9610. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (AnTuTu 10, GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
CPU cores and architecture
| Architecture | 1x 2.36 GHz – Cortex-A76 3x 2.22 GHz – Cortex-A76 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A73 4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
| Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
| Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
| Lithography | 7 nm | 10 nm |
| Number of transistors | 3000 million | |
| TDP | 6 Watt | 8 Watt |
| Neural Processing | Ascend D110 Lite, HUAWEI Da Vinci Architecture |
Memory (RAM)
| Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory-bus | 4x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
| Bandwidth | 11.9 Gbit/s |
Storage
| Storage specification | UFS 2.1 | UFS 2.1 |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MP6 | Mali-G72 MP3 |
| GPU Architecture | Mali Valhall | Mali Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Execution units | 6 | 3 |
| Shaders | 96 | 48 |
| DirectX | 12 | |
| OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.0 |
| OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
| Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
| Max screen resolution | 2560x1600 | |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 24MP, 2x 16MP |
| Max Video Capture | 4K@30fps | 4K@120fps |
| Video codec support | AV1 H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP8 VP9 |
Wireless
| 4G network | Yes | Yes |
| 5G network | Yes | Yes |
| Peak Download Speed | 1.6 Gbps | 0.6 Gbps |
| Peak Upload Speed | 0.2 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
| Wi-Fi | 6 (802.11ax) | 5 (802.11ac) |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
| Launch Date | 2020 March | 2018 Quarter 1 |
| Partnumber | S5E9610 | |
| Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
| Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 685
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 4 vs Apple A18 Pro
3
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 636
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 vs Samsung Exynos 2400e
5
MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9400 Plus
6
MediaTek Dimensity 920 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1200
7
MediaTek Helio G99 vs Google Tensor G1
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 768G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 870
9
Qualcomm Snapdragon 435 vs Samsung Exynos 8890
10
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3