MediaTek Dimensity 8050 vs Samsung Exynos 2400

VS
Which processor is better? We compared MediaTek Dimensity 8050 with Samsung Exynos 2400. Compare, analyze the specifications. Find out their scores in popular benchmarks (GeekBench 6 Single-Core, GeekBench 6 Multi-Core) and who is the winner?

GeekBench 6 Single-Core

Score
Dimensity 8050
1094
Exynos 2400
2194

GeekBench 6 Multi-Core

Score
Dimensity 8050
3349
Exynos 2400
6957

CPU cores and architecture

Architecture 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
5x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
4x 1.95 GHz – Cortex-A520
Number of cores 8 10
Instruction Set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
Lithography 6 nm 4 nm
TDP 6 Watt
Neural Processing MediaTek APU 570 NPU

Memory (RAM)

Max amount up to 16 GB up to 24 GB
Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
Memory frequency 2133 MHz 4200 MHz
Memory-bus 4x16 bit 4x16 bit

Graphics

GPU name Mali-G77 MP9 Xclipse 940
GPU Architecture Mali Valhall RDNA
GPU frequency 886 MHz 1095 MHz
Execution units 9 6
Shaders 288 768
DirectX 12.1
OpenCL API 2.0 2.0
Vulkan API 1.3 1.3

Camera, Video, Display

Max screen resolution 2520x1080 3840x2400
Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 320MP
Max Video Capture 4K@60fps 8K@30fps
Video codec support AV1
H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP9
AV1
H.264 (AVC)
H.265 (HEVC)
VP9

Wireless

4G network Yes Yes
5G network Yes Yes
Peak Download Speed 4.7 Gbps 9.64 Gbps
Peak Upload Speed 2.5 Gbps 2.55 Gbps
Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) 7 (802.11be)
Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
Satellite navigation BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
NavIC
QZSS
BeiDou
GPS
Galileo
GLONASS
NavIC
QZSS

Supplemental Information

Launch Date 2023 Quarter 2 2024 Quarter 1
Partnumber MT6893, MT6893Z_T/CZA S5E9945
Vertical Segment Mobiles Mobiles
Positioning Mid-end Flagship