MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc Tiger T618
The Unisoc Tiger T618 and MediaTek Dimensity 800U are two processors that can be compared based on their specifications.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, it features an architecture that consists of 2 Cortex-A75 cores running at 2.0 GHz, along with 6 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. The processor has a total of 8 cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The lithography of this processor is 12 nm, indicating that it is manufactured using a 12 nanometer process. The TDP, or thermal design power, of the Tiger T618 is 10 Watts, which determines the maximum amount of power the processor is designed to consume. Additionally, the Tiger T618 incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances the processor's capabilities in handling AI-related tasks.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 800U, it features an architecture that consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. This processor also has a total of 8 cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, like the Tiger T618. However, the Dimensity 800U has a lower lithography of 7 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process compared to the Tiger T618. Like the Tiger T618, the Dimensity 800U also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) to enhance its AI-related capabilities.
In comparing these two processors, it is clear that both offer a similar number of cores and support the same instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A76 cores and benefits from a more advanced 7 nm lithography. This suggests that the Dimensity 800U may offer better performance and power efficiency compared to the Tiger T618, especially for single-threaded or computationally-intensive tasks. Nevertheless, the Tiger T618 does have a slightly lower TDP, meaning it may consume less power under typical operating conditions.
Overall, both the Unisoc Tiger T618 and MediaTek Dimensity 800U have their own strengths and weaknesses, with the Dimensity 800U likely offering improved performance and power efficiency due to its higher clock speed and more advanced manufacturing process.
Starting with the Unisoc Tiger T618, it features an architecture that consists of 2 Cortex-A75 cores running at 2.0 GHz, along with 6 Cortex-A55 cores also running at 2.0 GHz. The processor has a total of 8 cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set. The lithography of this processor is 12 nm, indicating that it is manufactured using a 12 nanometer process. The TDP, or thermal design power, of the Tiger T618 is 10 Watts, which determines the maximum amount of power the processor is designed to consume. Additionally, the Tiger T618 incorporates a Neural Processing Unit (NPU), which enhances the processor's capabilities in handling AI-related tasks.
Moving on to the MediaTek Dimensity 800U, it features an architecture that consists of 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores running at 2.0 GHz. This processor also has a total of 8 cores and supports the ARMv8.2-A instruction set, like the Tiger T618. However, the Dimensity 800U has a lower lithography of 7 nm, indicating a more advanced manufacturing process compared to the Tiger T618. Like the Tiger T618, the Dimensity 800U also includes a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) to enhance its AI-related capabilities.
In comparing these two processors, it is clear that both offer a similar number of cores and support the same instruction set. However, the Dimensity 800U has a higher clock speed for its Cortex-A76 cores and benefits from a more advanced 7 nm lithography. This suggests that the Dimensity 800U may offer better performance and power efficiency compared to the Tiger T618, especially for single-threaded or computationally-intensive tasks. Nevertheless, the Tiger T618 does have a slightly lower TDP, meaning it may consume less power under typical operating conditions.
Overall, both the Unisoc Tiger T618 and MediaTek Dimensity 800U have their own strengths and weaknesses, with the Dimensity 800U likely offering improved performance and power efficiency due to its higher clock speed and more advanced manufacturing process.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
2x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Number of cores | 8 | 8 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 12 nm |
TDP | 10 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 6 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 850 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 2 |
Shaders | 48 | 32 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 2.1 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 2400x1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 64M |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@60fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.3 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.1 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 5 (802.11ac) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.0 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2019 August |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | T618 |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Mid-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
HiSilicon Kirin 9000 5G vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 820
2
Samsung Exynos 7880 vs HiSilicon Kirin 950
3
Apple A12 Bionic vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000
4
Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 vs MediaTek Dimensity 6080
5
Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G vs MediaTek Dimensity 7200
6
MediaTek Dimensity 700 vs MediaTek Dimensity 900
7
Samsung Exynos 980 vs Samsung Exynos 9820
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
9
Samsung Exynos 2200 vs HiSilicon Kirin 930
10
MediaTek Dimensity 720 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus