MediaTek Dimensity 800U vs Unisoc SC9832E
When comparing the Unisoc SC9832E and MediaTek Dimensity 800U processors, there are several key differences in their specifications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC9832E features 4 cores with a Cortex-A53 architecture. These cores have a clock speed of 1.4 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U has a more advanced architecture with 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This means that the Dimensity 800U can handle more complex tasks and has superior performance capabilities compared to the SC9832E.
In terms of the number of cores, the Dimensity 800U boasts 8 cores, while the SC9832E has only 4 cores. Having more cores allows for better multitasking and increased performance when handling multiple applications simultaneously. Thus, the Dimensity 800U has an advantage in terms of multitasking and overall performance.
The instruction set used by the SC9832E is ARMv8-A, which is a previous version of the ARM architecture. In contrast, the Dimensity 800U uses the more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This means that the Dimensity 800U is equipped with newer features and optimizations, potentially providing better efficiency and performance.
Another significant difference is the lithography technology used. The SC9832E is built on a 28 nm lithography process, while the Dimensity 800U utilizes a more advanced 7 nm process. A smaller lithography technology generally results in improved power efficiency and performance.
Lastly, the Dimensity 800U stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU enables accelerated machine learning applications, such as AI-powered photography and voice assistants. The SC9832E lacks this dedicated AI processing unit.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U outshines the Unisoc SC9832E in several aspects, including architecture, core count, instruction set, lithography, and the inclusion of a neural processing unit. These specifications make the Dimensity 800U a more powerful and efficient processor suitable for demanding tasks and advanced AI applications.
Starting with the CPU cores and architecture, the Unisoc SC9832E features 4 cores with a Cortex-A53 architecture. These cores have a clock speed of 1.4 GHz. On the other hand, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U has a more advanced architecture with 2 Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.4 GHz and 6 Cortex-A55 cores clocked at 2.0 GHz. This means that the Dimensity 800U can handle more complex tasks and has superior performance capabilities compared to the SC9832E.
In terms of the number of cores, the Dimensity 800U boasts 8 cores, while the SC9832E has only 4 cores. Having more cores allows for better multitasking and increased performance when handling multiple applications simultaneously. Thus, the Dimensity 800U has an advantage in terms of multitasking and overall performance.
The instruction set used by the SC9832E is ARMv8-A, which is a previous version of the ARM architecture. In contrast, the Dimensity 800U uses the more advanced ARMv8.2-A instruction set. This means that the Dimensity 800U is equipped with newer features and optimizations, potentially providing better efficiency and performance.
Another significant difference is the lithography technology used. The SC9832E is built on a 28 nm lithography process, while the Dimensity 800U utilizes a more advanced 7 nm process. A smaller lithography technology generally results in improved power efficiency and performance.
Lastly, the Dimensity 800U stands out with its Neural Processing Unit (NPU). The NPU enables accelerated machine learning applications, such as AI-powered photography and voice assistants. The SC9832E lacks this dedicated AI processing unit.
In summary, the MediaTek Dimensity 800U outshines the Unisoc SC9832E in several aspects, including architecture, core count, instruction set, lithography, and the inclusion of a neural processing unit. These specifications make the Dimensity 800U a more powerful and efficient processor suitable for demanding tasks and advanced AI applications.
CPU cores and architecture
Architecture | 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2.0 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
4x 1.4 GHz – Cortex-A53 |
Number of cores | 8 | 4 |
Instruction Set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8-A |
Lithography | 7 nm | 28 nm |
TDP | 7 Watt | |
Neural Processing | NPU |
Memory (RAM)
Max amount | up to 12 GB | up to 2 GB |
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR3 |
Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 667 MHz |
Memory-bus | 2x16 bit |
Storage
Storage specification | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G57 MP3 | Mali-T820 MP1 |
GPU Architecture | Valhall | Midgard |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 680 MHz |
Execution units | 3 | 1 |
Shaders | 48 | 4 |
DirectX | 12 | 11 |
OpenCL API | 2.1 | 1.2 |
OpenGL API | ES 3.2 | ES 3.2 |
Vulkan API | 1.2 | 1.0 |
Camera, Video, Display
Max screen resolution | 2520x1080@120Hz | 1440x720 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 1x 20MP + 1x 16MP | 1x 13MP |
Max Video Capture | 4K@30FPS | FullHD@30fps |
Video codec support | H.264 (AVC) H.265 (HEVC) VP9 |
H.264 (AVC) |
Wireless
4G network | Yes | Yes |
5G network | Yes | Yes |
Peak Download Speed | 2.77 Gbps | 0.15 Gbps |
Peak Upload Speed | 1.2 Gbps | 0.05 Gbps |
Wi-Fi | 5 (802.11ac) | 4 (802.11n) |
Bluetooth | 5.1 | 4.2 |
Satellite navigation | BeiDou GPS Galileo GLONASS QZSS |
BeiDou GPS GLONASS |
Supplemental Information
Launch Date | 2020 Quarter 3 | 2018 |
Partnumber | MT6853V, MT6853V/TNZA, MT6853/TNZA, MT6853T | |
Vertical Segment | Mobiles | Mobiles |
Positioning | Mid-end | Low-end |
AnTuTu 10
Total Score
GeekBench 6 Single-Core
Score
GeekBench 6 Multi-Core
Score
Popular comparisons:
1
MediaTek Helio G70 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1080
2
Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 vs Google Tensor G3
3
MediaTek Dimensity 9000 Plus vs Samsung Exynos 9609
4
MediaTek Dimensity 1100 vs MediaTek Dimensity 7050
5
Unisoc Tiger T610 vs Samsung Exynos 9825
6
Apple A16 Bionic vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1
7
MediaTek Helio G37 vs MediaTek Dimensity 1000L
8
Qualcomm Snapdragon 680 vs MediaTek Dimensity 9200
9
Samsung Exynos 7870 vs HiSilicon Kirin 960
10
Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 865